giovedì 18 agosto 2011

Australia. No Rights. No Justice

Dear Fellow Freedom Fighters,

JUSTICE DENIED - THROUGHOUT THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

The Australian Judiciary regard the Australian People as less than dirt ..... and their arrogance is blatant.

Below is a Court Transcript of NSW Supreme Court Judge Harrison refusing to allow me to prosecute the Daily Telegraph newspaper for Defamation. I filed a Notice of Motion late in October 2010, that had to be done under their regulations as a Notice of Motion in the case where the NSW Attorney General "succeeded" in having a NSW Supreme Court Judge (David Davies) declare me a "Vexatious Litigant" stripping me of my Human, Civil and Political Rights by depriving me of access to the Courts.

That Notice of Motion was asking permission to file a Statement of Claim for Defamation.

Apart from that, I filed a similar Notice of Motion asking for permission to prosecute a Police Officer for attempting to choke me in my own home, for stealing my video camera, unlawful arrest and trespass.... that was similarly refused by another NSW Supreme Court Judge (Elizabeth Fullerton) with the Sheriffs assaulting me, at the time, and throwing me into the street.

Similarly, I also filed, in the Court of Appeal, an Appeal against my conviction by NSW District Court Judge (Christopher Armitage) ...... and, there again, the NSW Attorney General was "successful" in having the Registrar stop the Appeal for proceeding on the grounds that I have to ask a NSW Supreme Court Judge for permission to Appeal.

Firstly, below is the transcript of Harrison J (which arrived by email just last week) - and secondly, below that I have included an excellent email sent by Ray Levick.

Yours sincerely,

John Wilson.

Chairman, Australian Common Law Party.

http://www.rightsandwrong.com.au/pdf/Free%20Man%20or%20Slave001.pdf

NOTE: Copyright in this transcript is reserved to the Crown. The reproduction, except under authority from the Crown, of the contents

of this transcript for any purpose other than the conduct of these proceedings is prohibited.

CDA:CAT

IN THE SUPREME COURT

OF NEW SOUTH WALES

COMMONLAW DIVISION

HARRISON J

WEDNESDAY 30 MARCH 2011

2010/00049922 - THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NSW v JOHN WILSON

No appearance for the Plaintiff

Defendant appeared in person

HIS HONOUR: In this matter the application for leave to commence

proceedings is dismissed. I publish my reasons.

DEFENDANT: I challenge the jurisdiction of the Court. I challenge the

jurisdiction of the Court. I am a free man. I have the right to trial by jury.

HIS HONOUR: Jolly good. All right. Can you call the next matter please?

WILSON: I challenge the jurisdiction of the Court.

HIS HONOUR: I heard you.

DEFENDANT: And you're disregarding that. You're disregarding my legal rights. You're disregarding the legal procedures. It's a kangaroo Court.

HIS HONOUR: All right.

DEFENDANT: All right. You admit it's a kangaroo Court.

HIS HONOUR: That's your view. You have a good day Mr Wilson. All the best to you.

oOo

From: wayne levick

Sent: Monday, March 16, 2009 7:01 AM

To: John Wilson

Subject: Materials

Teaching the High Court Australia, the Rule of Law and basic Human Rights: when is Ignorance NOT an excuse?

The article demonstrates the stranglehold lawyers have on the media. We make Judges out of these people! No wonder the country is in a mess. Lawyers refuse to accept HREOA1986 as law, because it makes their monopoly profession, an illegal one, and without discrimination, anyone can be a lawyer/advocate.

Combine it with our Notice of a Constitutional Matter, Writ of Mandamus, Lets see if we cant celebrate the 60th Anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the year that Australians get confirmation of their already passed and underused Bill of Rights.

On December the 9th 2008, the Sydney Morning Herald published the latest in about twenty two years of lawyer generated propaganda, against the Australian Bill of Rights. This is misleading and deceptive conduct, and the Newspaper should should be taken to the Federal Court of Australia, and fined heavily. Helen Irving is Associate Professor in the Faculty of Law at the University of Sydney.

http://kangaroocourtaustralia.com/

http://iwitness.x24hr.com/kangaroo_court_australia/index.php?showtopic=11345

The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), was enacted as a Federal Law, by the Labor Party with Liberal Party support as Schedule 2 to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 . Reading and understanding a Statute:

· The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 is a Statute.

· The Acts Interpretation Act 1901 is a Statute.

· The Judiciary Act 1903 is a Statute.

· The Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 is a Statute.

· The Trade Practices Act 1974 is a Statute.

· The Criminal Code Act 1995 ( Cth) is a Statute

· The Privacy Act 1988 is a Statute

· The Evidence Act 1995, (Cth) is a Stautue.

Multiple Federal Court Judges and High Court Judges, including the Chief Justice of HIGH COURT AUSTRALIA, Robert Stenton French, have now called HREOA1986 as a general rule, or dismissed it outright, as an act of treason against the Australian people.

The First Statute on the list has two Supremacy Clauses:

S 5 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 makes every Federal Law supreme and

S 109 makes them prevail,over all State Enactments.

The second says a Schedule is part of an Act ( Statute).

The Third says that the common law shall prevail, in S 80 Judiciary Act 1903.

The Fourth makes it a common law crime to disobey a Statute, by misleading and deceiving the good people of Australia, are criminals,

The Fifth refers to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights not just in its Dictionary, but in three offences in Schedule Section 3.

The Fourth specifically implements the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

In the fifth, in Section 138 (3) (f) Evidence Act 1995, (Cth) , are told where to find the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

The article demonstrates the stranglehold lawyers have on the media. We make Judges out of these people! No wonder the country is in a mess. Lawyers refuse to accept it as law, because it makes their monopoly profession, an illegal one, and without discrimination, anyone can be a lawyer/advocate.

http://kangaroocourtaustralia.com

http://iwitness.x24hr.com/kangaroo_court_australia/index.php?showtopic=11345

Death of Mandamus: French, Hayne, Gummow, Crennan JJ protecting and coverup conspiracy to pervert justice

http://iwitness.x24hr.com/kangaroo_court_australia/index.php?showtopic=11130

Invalid Australian Constitution empowers crooked (High Court) Judges to violate Common Law rights for ALL Australians

http://iwitness.x24hr.com/kangaroo_court_australia/index.php?showtopic=10581