domenica 30 giugno 2013
Sorkin released a lengthy screed in Dealbook defending Goldman
Glenn Greenwald
AP Photo/Vincent Yu
So New York Times Dealbook writer Andrew Ross Sorkin has apologized to journalist Glenn Greenwald for saying he'd "almost arrest" him, for his supposed aid and comfort of NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden. "I veered into hyperbole," was Sorkin's explanation.
I got into trouble the other day on Twitter for asking if David Gregory may have just had a "brain fart" when he asked Greenwald his infamous question, "To the extent that you have aided and abetted Snowden, even in his current movements, why shouldn't you be charged with a crime?"
James Robertson Newsletter No. 41 - May 2013
Newsletter No. 41 - May 2013
Links to previous Newsletters can be found here.
To be notified of new Newsletters, click here.
CONTENTS
1. Introduction
1. INTRODUCTION
As the urgent need to understand and reconstruct key parts of the world's money system becomes clearer and clearer, this newsletter summarises where we are and where we must go next.
2. A LEADERSHIP VACUUM
We face a great crisis. The current money system is motivating us to destroy the future for our grandchildren and great grandchildren by compelling us to compete against other people and countries, and encouraging us to destroy the planet's resources.
The outlines of a solution are now clear. A reformed money system will be one that motivates and enables us to help one another to meet our needs, including the need for justice in our world society and the need to conserve the planet's resources on which our survival depends.
However moving to that solution, and overcoming doubts and vested interests, is going to require a great deal of energy and courage from us all. It will also require great leadership from our politicians.
Past crises have brought forth great leaders. At the moment, the political leadership that is needed so badly is simply not there.
National leaders - from Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Russia, the United Kingdom and the United States, together with the European Union - will meet at the G8 meeting in Northern Ireland on 17-18 Jun. Will they live up to the challenge? I fear not.
That is in spite of the fact that the British Prime Minister chairing the meeting has pledged to tackle the "staggering" levels of tax evasion as a key priority of the UK's presidency of the G8 this year. Seewww.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/may/09/100-richest-uk-billions-offshore-tax-havens - especially its final paragraph.
Protesting NGOs may live up to the challenge somewhat better. Examples include the World Development Movement "shouting out for Justice" (www.wdm.org.uk), and the Progressive Development Forum"telling the truth about aid" (http://progressivedevelopmentforum.wordpress.com).
But neither the G8 leaders nor the protesting NGOs are likely to respond with enough understanding of the deeply rooted challenge imposed on the human community by the present money system.
(For some important consequences of that, see the following:
3. UNDERSTANDING THE SCALE OF THE CHALLENGE WE FACE
The behaviour of almost everyone on Earth, with its effects on the lives of other people and the natural world, is now motivated to a great extent by how the money system works. We need to understand:
(1) how that process of motivation happens;
(2) how it is now motivating us to behave in ways that threaten our future;
(3) how to change the way it works; and
(4) what we can do to make sure it is changed that way.
Assuming it is not already too late, radical reform of the whole worldwide money system is urgently needed, involving:
(1) a restructuring of national money systems, and a reduction of their present centralising power;
(2) further development of the international money system and local money systems; and
(3) the purposeful evolution of them all into a global system that serves the various common interests of all the world’s people more effectively, democratically and ecologically than the global system serves us today.
This may well involve a radical structural change in politics. See for example John Bunzl in The Huffington Post on "The Right Mourn Thatcher; The Left, Any Sense of Direction" -http://tinyurl.com/b26dloz.
And it will almost certainly require peaceful revolutionary action by squeezed middle class people, as described by David Boyle in his latest book, Broke: Who Killed the Middle Classes? - www.david-boyle.co.uk/broke which I heartily recommend.
Failing that, we will continue down the road to self-destruction. See for example www.monbiot.com/2013/05/10/via-dolorosa.
4. THE PRACTICAL REFORMS
Three component reforms will contribute to National Money System Reform. They are:
- monetary reform (changing how the money supply is created );
- public revenue reform (changing what is taxed and not taxed); and
- public spending reform (changing what public revenue is spent on and what not).
Those shifts will transform the present national money system into one that is more intelligently organised. They will mean shifting away from a redistribution of resources that fails to correct the outcomes of a badly organised money system, to a predistribution of resources that provides the basis for a money system better designed to serve the necessary purposes of money today. (For more about predistribution, please see the Introduction to my March 2013 newsletter.)
First, the national money supply.
This will be changed into a truly public service. It will stop the creation of money by commercial banks as profit-making debt. It will make the central bank responsible for creating money debt-free and giving it as public revenue to the elected government to spend into circulation.
Second, public revenue.
Changes in other sources of public revenue will shift taxes off ‘goods’ on to 'bads’. This will mean:
(a) Abolishing taxes on value added, incomes and profits that penalise useful work and enterprise.
(b) Replacing those taxes with charges on things and activities that subtract value from common resources for private benefit. These will include taxes or charges on land values and on the use of other common resources, mainly environmental including the capacity of the environment to absorb pollution and waste.
Third, public spending.
Changes will include a people-centred shift in public spending including:
(a) Introducing a Citizen’s Income – a tax-free income paid to every man, woman and child as a right of citizenship.
(b) Meeting the costs of that by reducing the costs of:
(i) interest on government debt,
(ii) perverse subsidies,(iii) contracting out public infrastructure and services to commercial and financial businesses, and(iv) public sector inefficiency and waste.
These national reforms will also provide the international money system with a model designed to meet the challenges of world society today and in the future; and it will provide local money systems with an enabling context for a revival in more self-reliant local economies, instead of their present disabling one.
NB. These practical reforms are more fully explained in Future Money.
5. PROGRESS: MONEY SYSTEM REFORM AS A WHOLE
A simple philosophical principle underlies all three of the reforms at items 2, 3, and 4 above - how the money supply is created, what is taxed and what is not taxed, and what is public money spent on and what not.
The principle is that everyone should pay into public revenue the value of the common resources they use for their own profit, and they should receive from public spending a share in the total value of common resources.
As supporters of those separate reforms recognise that supporters of the others share those principles too, support for the separate reforms and for money system reform as a whole are quickening.
(1) Alanna Hartzok is a prominent example - see www.earthrightsinstitute.org. She is the current General Secretary of the International Union for Land Value Taxation- www.theiu.org.
Earlier this month she gave a paper in New York to the annual meeting of the North American Basic Income Guarantee Congress -www.usbig.net/congresses.php.
The importance of the occasion is that it expressed co-operation between supporters of two of the three main component reforms in total money system reform - land value taxation and basic income. She is now looking forward to future big meetings at which supporters of all three reforms - money supply, land value taxation and basic income (Citizen’s Income) - will come together.
I greatly appreciate that Alanna's paper was A Tribute to the New Economics of James Robertson. Its abstract was as follows:
"James Robertson, co-founder of The New Economics Foundation and The Other Economic Summit, has been called “that most subversive of men, the eminently reasonable revolutionary". His vision for a new economics for the 21st century is multi-dimensional and local-to-global.
Robertson advocates for a universal basic income in combination with socialization of resource rent, land value taxation, green taxes, widespread ownership of productive capital and fundamental monetary policy reform. He foresees a multi-polar world that is both decentralized for local self-reliance and a revived household economy as well as global rules for international trade and finance.His perspective on “the real economy” involves a reorientation of work, technology, energy, agriculture, transport, health, education, leisure, science, philosophy and religion. Robertson is a new economics renaissance man.This session will be a tribute to his work and writings."
(The full presentation can be downloaded here for any readers who are interested to see it.)
Alanna gave another paper in April to the World Bank's Land and Poverty 2013 conference in Washington on "Socializing Land Rent, Untaxing Production" - see www.earthrights.net/docs/2013-WorldBank-Hartzok-LandRent.pdf.
The IU Conference 2013 on "Economics for Conscious Evolution" will be held in London on 24 – 28 July - see www.theiu.org/conference-2013-full-programme. Apart from Alanna's organising role, her fellow participants in one session will include Aniol Esteban, the Head of Economics at New Economics Foundation.
(2) Another prominent example of a supporter of all three reforms is Michael Kumhof. He is well known for the IMF Research Report -www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2012/wp12202.pdf - on "The Chicago Plan Revisited".
It supports arguments for transferring the creation of the money supply to a public agency. But he also suggests taxing incomes gained from land values, etc - see www.theiu.org/news/imf-speaks-taxing-economic-rent.html; and I have been told that the other day in New York he suggested that the public revenue from money supply reform could help to finance a Citizen’s Income.
(3) The Coalition for Economic Justice - www.c4ej.com includes twelve think-tanks, charities and pressure groups, joining in response to the current economic situation. It is concentrating at present on the introduction of a Land Value Tax.
But its members are also concerned with reducing Tax Poverty, thereform of the Money Supply,and the introduction of a Citizen's Income (Basic Income). A good example is the Systemic Fiscal Reform Group - see www.systemicfiscalreform.org.
(4) I hope George Monbiot will complete the picture he gives in his important recent Guardian article "Communism, welfare state - what's the next big idea?" –www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/apr/01/alternative-to-war-on-britains-poor.
He mentioned land value taxation and a basic income as inspiring, transfiguring ideas - offering an alternative to war on Britain's poor. If he had added reforming how the money supply is created, he would have hit on a truly inspiring big idea.
As he concluded, "These ideas require courage: the courage to confront the government, the opposition, the plutocrats, the media, the suspicions of a wary electorate. But without proposals on this scale, progressive politics is dead. They strike that precious spark, so seldom kindled in this age of triangulation and timidity – the spark of hope".
(5) This report came in yesterday from Stephen Zarlenga -
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/gang8/message/17015.
It shows that, at a recent event in New York arranged by the American Monetary Institute, three of the eight speakers were Georgist supporters of Land Value Taxation in discussion with supporters of reforming the Money Supply (monetary reform).
It is another example of the co-operation starting to grow between supporters of the three main components of overall money system reform.
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/gang8/message/17015.
It shows that, at a recent event in New York arranged by the American Monetary Institute, three of the eight speakers were Georgist supporters of Land Value Taxation in discussion with supporters of reforming the Money Supply (monetary reform).
It is another example of the co-operation starting to grow between supporters of the three main components of overall money system reform.
6. PRESSURES on MONEY SUPPLY and BANKING REFORM
(a) A conspiracy of silence? A bitingly penetrating critique by James Bruges at http://political-cleanup.org/?p=6874.
(b) How central banks undermine the market economy. Central banking expert and author of The Money Trap, Robert Pringle (whose new book I discussed in the March 2013 newsletter) deplores "the systematic exploitation of savers by reckless borrowers, including governments and big banks propped up with state money".
" ... governments get their budget deficits financed courtesy of central banks, central banks’ balance sheets replace markets, too-big-fail-bankers get their bonuses financed by state subsidies, corporations hoard cash, while workers, consumers and savers are screwed. Thank you very much".
(c) Sir Mervyn King will retire at the end of June. Mark Carney from Canada will succeed him as Governor of the Bank of England.
During the coming month will King aim to give the impression that he leaves things in good shape and will Carney let it be known that he faces a formidable challenge? It will be interesting to see. They are both human after all.
In any case I hope someone will tell Carney that he has a chance to make history as a great leader by starting to fill the “leadership vacuum" described at 2 above.
(d) In "Global Research" ( May 1), Ellen Brown explains why she says "Depositors Beware: Theft is Legal for Big Banks, and Your Money Will Never Be Safe ". See www.globalresearch.ca/depositors-beware-theft-is-legal-for-big-banks-and-your-money-will-never-be-safe/5333631.
[Note: Support continues to grow for Land Value Taxation and a Citizen's (Basic) Income. I will be reporting their future progress in a later newsletter.]
7. SOME UPCOMING EVENTS
31 May, central Dublin: The Money Mess : Consequences & Alternatives, organised by Feasta and Sensible Money. Great programme. Details at http://themoneymess.eventbrite.com.
1 June, central London: Land Value Taxation and the Covenant with God, organised by the Christian Council for Monetary Justice and Land Research Trust. Details atwww.eventbrite.com/event/5506287454/eorg.
2-4 June, San Rafael, California: Public Banking Conference 2013,Funding the New Economy. Details at www.publicbankinginamerica.org.
10-15 June, London: The Spark - A week of workshops and events to strengthen the movement for economic justice in the run-up to the G8 meeting on 17-18 June. Details at www.jubileedebtcampaign.org.uk/?lid=8255.
15-23 June, Bristol's Big Green Week and Schumacher Lectures 2013. Details at www.schumacher.org.uk.
24-28 July, London: IU (International Union for Land Value Taxation)Conference 2013 – Economics for Conscious Evolution. Details at www.theiu.org/conference-2013-full-programme.
19-22 September, University Center, Chicago: 9th Annual AMI Monetary Reform Conference. Main theme: Implementing Monetary Reform now! Details at www.monetary.org/2013-conference.
8. AN ADDITION TO MY WEBSITE
If you look at www.jamesrobertson.com/turningpoint.htm, you will now see a full set of Turning Point (2000) newletters from February 1977 to January 2000. (We sent none out in the two year period between Autumn 1987 and Autumn 1989.)
With the passing of time I feel that the website should provide some archival, historical information about "alternatives", as well as suggesting how alternative policies should be supported today.
James Robertson
23 May 2013
PS. On 28 May, I sent out an additional email.
I hope that many recipients of the newsletters will be interested to sign this petition -www.avaaz.org/en/petition/End_the_debtbased_money_system.
It is closely related to Item 1 above.
It asks the world leaders at the G8 meeting in Northern Ireland next month to imagine having the courage to end the power of the banks to create the money supply out of nothing and charge us interest on it.
It has been initiated by Marian Farrell who lives in Northern Ireland -http://transitionderry.ning.com/profile/marianfarrell.
Marian interviewed me in March 2009 about why mainstream monetary reform is important for local monetary, financial and economic decentralisation in Transition Towns like Derry and other places aiming for local sustainability.
The interview can be heard here -www.jamesrobertson.com/videoandaudio.htm.
sabato 29 giugno 2013
Lawsuit against Bank of America by homeowners
Bank of America’s Foreclosure Frenzy
In another corner, we have Bank of America, which says nothing could be further from the truth.
About Jonathan Weil»
Jonathan Weil joined Bloomberg News as a columnist in 2007, and his columns on finance and accounting won Best ...MORE
FOLLOW ON TWITTER
Who’s right? If anything, the bank’s strident denials make me more inclined to believe the workers’ claims. “These allegations are absurd, patently false and contrary to Bank of America’s long-standing policy only to foreclose as a last resort when other available options to help keep people in their home have been exhausted,” Jumana Bauwens, a Bank of America spokeswoman, told Bloomberg News in an e-mail this week.
Perhaps some of the allegations may be wrong. But to say all of them are obviously false? You have to wonder. A lot of the former employees’ claims make sense.
We have known for years that the U.S. Treasury Department’s Home Affordable Modification Program failed miserably at its stated goal of helping struggling homeowners. In part, that’sbecause companies and divisions of major banks that service mortgage loans often can make more money from foreclosures than from loan modifications.
It didn’t bother the banking industry’s “robo-signers” that they risked committing perjury when they signed false affidavits filed in courthouses across the country to speed foreclosures along. Now, Bank of America would have us believe that all of these former employees were making things up under penalty of perjury when they came forward and told their stories.
Loan Modifications
The former employees’ statements were filed with a federal court in Boston as part of alawsuit against Bank of America by homeowners who say they were improperly denied permanent loan modifications. Bank of America says it will respond to the statements in greater detail in a court filing.
The workers gave horrific accounts about Bank of America’s compliance with the Home Affordable Modification Program. One consistent theme was that they said they were told to deceive borrowers about the status of their applications.
“My colleagues and I were instructed to inform homeowners that modification documents were not received on time, not received at all, or that documents were missing, even when, in fact, all documents were received in full and on time,” said Theresa Terrelonge of Grand Prairie, Texas, who worked at Bank of America from 2009 to 2010 as a loan-servicing representative. She said workers “were awarded incentives such as $25 in cash, or as a restaurant gift card” based on “how many applications for loan modifications they could decline.”
Simone Gordon of Orange, New Jersey, who left Bank of America in 2012, gave a similar account. “Employees were rewarded by meeting a quota of placing a specific number of accounts into foreclosure, including accounts in which the borrower fulfilled a HAMP trial period,” Gordon said. “For example, a collector who placed ten or more accounts into foreclosure in a given month received a $500 bonus.” Other rewards for placing accounts intoforeclosure included gift cards to Target or Bed Bath & Beyond.
“We were regularly drilled that it was our job to maximize fees for the bank by fostering and extending delay of the HAMP modification process by any means we could -- this included by lying to customers,” Gordon said.
William Wilson, a Bank of America underwriter and manager in Charlotte, North Carolina, from 2010 to 2012, described what he said was called a “blitz.” About twice a month, he said, Bank of America would order case managers and underwriters to clean out the backlog of HAMP applications by rejecting any file in which the documents were more than 60 days old. Employees were instructed to “enter a reason that would justify declining the modification to the Treasury Department,” Wilson said.
A Blitz
“Justifications commonly included claiming that the homeowner had failed to return requested documents or had failed to make payments,” he said. “In reality these justifications were untrue. I personally reviewed hundreds of files in which the computer systems showed that the homeowner had fulfilled a trial period plan and was entitled to a permanent loan modification,” but was nevertheless declined during a blitz.
“On many occasions, homeowners who did not receive the permanent modification that they were entitled to ultimately lost their homes to foreclosure,” he said.
After Bloomberg wrote last week about the former employees’ statements, the top Democrat on the House Financial Services Committee, Maxine Waters, sent a letter to Christy Romero, the special inspector general of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, asking that her office investigate. Yet it’s hard to get one’s hopes up about the government’s desire to get at the truth.
There already has been a $25 billion nationwide whitewash of a settlement between regulators and big banks over improper foreclosure practices, along with billion-dollar payments under a different settlement to consultants who were hired to review those practices. Nobody was prosecuted, much less wrist-slapped.
This week, the court-appointed monitor overseeing compliance with the terms of the national mortgage settlement said he found “more work needs to be done” by big mortgage servicers to improve their treatment of customers. But neither he nor the regulators have ever reported anything as dubious as the conduct described in the former Bank of America employees’ court declarations. Perhaps they just missed a bunch of stuff.
If there was a good reason to believe that the government’s priority is to investigate big banks rather than protect them, maybe Bank of America’s blanket denial would seem more credible.
(Jonathan Weil is a Bloomberg View columnist.)
Irish bankers 'hoodwinked' government
Irish bankers 'hoodwinked' government over bailout, secret recordings show
Taped conversations back up the view that Anglo Irish bankers knew that €7bn would never be enough to save the bank
Building site of Anglo Irish Bank HQ in Dublin, 2010. Tape recordings suggest bankers 'hoodwinked' the government over the size of the bailout. Photograph: Kim Haughton for the Guardian
A top banker with the financial institution that almost bankrupted Irelandboasted that he had picked the figure of €7bn (£5.9bn) they told the Irish government was needed to rescue the Anglo Irish Bank "out of his arse".
Taped phone calls between two senior executives at Anglo Irish have compounded suspicions in the Republic that bankers lured the then Fianna Fáil led government during the crash of September 2008 into a costly financial trap by saving the debt-stricken bank with public money.
In the end the Irish taxpayer was forced to hand over €30bn to save Anglo Irish Bank from collapse and resulted in the state going cap in hand to the International Monetary Fund, the European Central Bank and the EU to save the country from national bankruptcy.
The bank's audio recordings – obtained by The Irish Independent – are of conversations between two senior Anglo Irish managers in September 2008, John Bowe and Peter Fitzgerald. Initially the bank had asked Ireland's central Bank for €7bn to prop up its parlous finances following the Irish property crash. Critics of the bailout have insisted Anglo Irish bank executives always knew that the figure would be far higher – ultimately more than four times higher.
On tape Fitzgerald asks Bowe how did he arrive at the figure of €7bn to which the latter replies: "Just as Drummer [the then Anglo Irish Bank CEO David Drumm now in exile and disgrace in Boston] would say, 'picked it out my arse.'"
The conversation also tends to back up the view that Anglo Irish bankers knew that €7bn would never be enough to save the bank but once they had hoodwinked the Dublin government the taxpayer would keep picking up the tab.
In their exchange Bowe says: "Yeah, and that number is seven, but the reality is that actually we need more than that. But you know the strategy here is you pull them in, you get them to write a big cheque and they have to keep, they have to have support their money, you know."
On the Irish government getting entrapped by Anglo, Bowe adds: "If they say, if they saw the enormity of it up front, they might decide, they might decide they have a choice. You know what I mean? They might say the cost to the taxpayer is too high. But ... em ... if it doesn't look big at the outset ... if it looks big, big enough to be important, but not too big that it kind of spoils everything, then then I think you have a chance."
The two bankers are also heard laughing and joking at a time when the bank was tottering on the brink of destruction. They are heard saying they hope the bank is nationalised so "we'd keep our jobs".
Bowe who was approached over the weekend about the 2008 conversations claimed the remarks were "off-the-cuff comments" and denied he was trying to mislead the state with underestimated figures.
Fitzgerald released a statement through his solicitor stating that "I am not nor have I ever been aware of a strategy or intention on the part of the Anglo Irish Bank to mislead authorities in relation to the forecasted funding position of Anglo Irish Bank."
Despite the pair's denials, the taped conversations at a critical time in the toxic bank's history will increase the pressure for a full parliamentary inquiry into the bank rescue deal which cost the taxpayer a further €30bn after two other debt-ridden banks, the Bank of Ireland and Allied Irish Bank had to be saved from collapse.
Unlike the United States, no senior Irish banker has gone to jail or been found guilty in any court so far. The leading lights in Anglo, once regarded as masters of the financial universe who kept fuelling the Celtic Tiger, are now among the most hated figures in the Republic's history.
Anglo Irish Bank epitomised the rise and ignominious fall of the Celtic Tiger economy. It was the preferred lender for property speculators and builders. Among its stellar business clients was Ireland's one-time richest man Sean Quinn who borrowed hundreds of millions of euros from Anglo Irish to fund the building of a worldwide property which has since melted away. Quinn's gambling with Anglo Irish's loans resulted in him being made bankrupt and finally jailed for failing to hand over assets to the bank once it was nationalised.
Iscriviti a:
Post (Atom)
Post in evidenza
The Great Taking - The Movie
David Webb exposes the system Central Bankers have in place to take everything from everyone Webb takes us on a 50-year journey of how the C...
-
Miscommunicated Monetary Theory T Sabri Öncü ( sabri.oncu@gmail.com ) is an econom...
-
Central banks in 46 countries are considering creating a central bank digital currency (CBDC) using a constrained form of distributed le...
-
Questo è Cefis. L’altra faccia dell’onorato presidente - di Giorgio Steimetz, Agenzia Milano Informazioni, 1972 01 Le due potenze occulte d...
