Marco Saba's historic speech at UniCredit shareholders meeting in 2014
https://www.unicreditgroup.eu/content/dam/unicreditgroup-eu/documents/en/governance/shareholders-meetings/archive/2014/shareholders-meeting-13-maggio-2014/Minutes-May-13-2014.pdf
Mr Marco SABA took the floor and made the following speech:
“I address all of the Directors and, by extended greeting, all shareholders.
My name is Marco Saba, and I am speaking as the delegate of shareholder Christian Savatteri. I ask for a copy of my speech to be transcribed with the minutes.
I wish to begin by stating that my topic of intervention is item 1 on the Agenda, UniCredit’s 2013 consolidated financial statements, specifically its legality, legal and economic underpinnings, with recourse to “exceptio veritatis”, in compliance with IAS standard 8 and Bank of Italy Circular no.262 dated 22 December 2005, amended for the second time on 21 January 2014, which states the following: “If, in exceptional situations, application of a provision envisaged under international accounting principles is inconsistent with the true and correct balance sheet, financial situation and earnings results, it should not be applied.”
The drafting of UniCredit’s financial statements must take into account the fact that in addition to marginal gross income, banks create new money every time they lend or invest, a fact confirmed recently by Bank of France General Council member Bernard Maris, as well as in Bank of England Bulletin no. 1, 2014. This creation of liquidity is not highlighted as it should be among income statement activities; it may only be deduced secondarily under item 70 as loans to clients on the consolidated balance sheet (on page 82), where it is stated at Euro 503.1 billion, a figure miles away from the Euro 3.4 billion indicated in the consolidated cash flow statement on page 88 as “liquidity generated over the period”. I restrict myself to this 503.1 billion, as I consider right now that the cloning of money that took place in 2013 through cash payments and during foreign currency transactions is of secondary importance. The current balance sheet is therefore clearly spoiled by significant errors, indeed, material errors of omission, which must be corrected pursuant to the above-mentioned provisions. As it stands, the operating results for the financial year are not a true and correct representation, as they forgo an item for the creation of money supply, or rather, liquidity generated just prior to being used for commitments during FY 2013. If we adjust UniCredit’s consolidated financial statements, considering therefore just item 70 on the consolidated income statement (on page 82) – “Loans to customers” - and shifting it over to item 280 on the consolidated income statement (on page 84) - that is, “Profit (Loss) before tax from continuing operations” - we come up with a gross profit of Euro 487.9 billion, rather than the gross loss of Euro 50.2 billion that was posted. There is a difference of at least Euro 503 billion less to recoup. Net of taxation at 27.5% we would therefore have - under item 340 of the consolidated income statement – net operating profit of at least 353 billion, rather than the net loss of billions of euros we see today. It follows that, for distribution of the dividend, we should be referring to the adjusted net profit which, at the same rate, works out at around Euro 61 per share. By restoring the bank’s accounts to in bonis status, by way of example the three largest shareholders Blackrock, Aabar and PGFF would be in line to bank around Euro 17 billion each.
On the other hand, the consolidated financial statements presented today artfully overturn the real earnings result and hoodwink all shareholders. It should further be noted that the tax authorities are down Euro 150 billion on the deal, and that the CGIL Union did well recently to seek the reintroduction of the crime of false accounting and laundering one’s own money.
I am therefore against approving the current financial statements, and ask the pro-tempore
CEO for a written response to this speech within the next 15 calendar days.
Those interested should not hesitate to contact me if they wish to have further explanations of the research I have undertaken as Head of Research at the Centro Studi Monetari, and on the sources that can be used to recoup the shortfall.
I reserve the right to act in any forum and at any level to protect the interests of my delegating party, notwithstanding the associated benefits pursuant to Section 930 of the Italian Civil Code, and I conclude by thanking everybody in attendance for listening to me. "
"Replying to Mr Saba , who believed that UniCredit’s economic performance for the period had not been accurately or fairly represented, since there was no reference to the monetary aggregate generated in FY 2013, and stated that he would be voting against the approval of the accounts, asking the Chief Executive Officer for a written reply within the next fifteen calendar days, Mr Ghizzoni pointed out that both the consolidated accounts and the individual balance sheet reported by UniCredit S.p.A. had been drafted in accordance with international accounting standards (IAS and IFRS), and with the provisions laid down by the Bank of Italy, and had been certified by the audit firm Deloitte & Touche."
Iscriviti a:
Commenti sul post (Atom)
Post in evidenza
The Great Taking - The Movie
David Webb exposes the system Central Bankers have in place to take everything from everyone Webb takes us on a 50-year journey of how the C...
-
Questo è Cefis. L’altra faccia dell’onorato presidente - di Giorgio Steimetz, Agenzia Milano Informazioni, 1972 01 Le due potenze occulte d...
-
Secret Data Centres including GCHQ's Tempora and NSA's PRISM projects Permalink (where you can find location links) Perhaps ...
-
VENICE and LEIBNIZ: The Battle for a Science of Economy By Michael Kirsch LaRouchePAC If citizens knew that between Isaac Newton, Rene...
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento