venerdì 23 marzo 2012

Special committee on organised crime, corruption and money laundering


Texts adopted
Wednesday, 14 March 2012 - Strasbourg
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-TA-2012-0078+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN
Provisional edition
Mandate of the special committee on organised crime, corruption and money laundering, its powers, numerical composition and term of office
P7_TA-PROV(2012)0078B7-0151/2012

 European Parliament decision of 14 March 2012 on setting up a special committee on organised crime, corruption and money laundering, its powers, numerical composition and term of office
The European Parliament ,
–  having regard to the decision of the Conference of Presidents of 16 February 2012 to propose that a special committee on organised crime, corruption and money laundering be set up and its powers and numerical composition defined,
–  having regard to its resolution of 25 October 2011 on organised crime in the European Union(1) , whereby it expressed its intention to set up a special committee,
–  having regard to its resolution of 15 September 2011 on the EU's efforts to combat corruption(2),
–  having regard to Rule 184 of its Rules of Procedure,
1.  Decides to set up a special committee on organised crime, corruption and money laundering, with the following remit:
  (a)to analyse and evaluate the extent of organised crime, corruption and money laundering and its impact on the Union and its Member States and to propose appropriate measures to enable the Union to forestall and counter these threats, including at international, European and national level;
  (b)to analyse and evaluate the current implementation of Union legislation on organised crime, corruption and money laundering, and related policies, in order to ensure that Union law and policies are evidence-based and supported by the best available threat assessments, as well as to monitor their compatibility with fundamental rights in accordance with Articles 2 and 6 of the Treaty on European Union, in particular the rights set out in the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and the principles underpinning the Union's external action, in particular those set out in Article 21 of the Treaty;
  (c)to examine and scrutinise the implementation of the role and activities of the Union home affairs agencies (such as Europol, the COSI and Eurojust) working on matters relating to organised crime, corruption and money laundering, and related security policies;
  (d)to address the issues referred to in its resolution of 25 October 2011 on organised crime in the European Union, and notably paragraph 15 thereof(3) , as well as in its resolution of 15 September 2011on the EU's efforts to combat corruption,
  (e)to these ends, to establish the necessary contacts, make visits and hold hearings with the European Union institutions and with the international, European and national institutions, the national parliaments and governments of the Member States and of third countries, and representatives of the scientific community, business and civil society, as well as grassroots actors, victims’ organisations, the officials involved in the daily fight against organised crime, corruption and money laundering, such as law enforcement agencies, judges and magistrates, and civil society actors who promote a culture of legality in difficult areas;

2.  Decides, given that the powers of Parliament's standing committees with responsibility for matters concerning the adoption, monitoring and implementation of Union legislation relating to this area remain unchanged, that the special committee may make recommendations regarding the measures and initiatives to be taken, in close collaboration with the standing committees;
3.  Decides that the special committee shall have 45 members;
4.  Decides that the term of office of the special committee shall be 12 months, beginning on 1 April 2012, with the possibility of extension; decides that the special committee shall present to Parliament a mid-term report and a final report containing recommendations concerning the measures and initiatives to be taken.

(1)Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0459.
(2)Texts adopted, P7_TA(2011)0388.
(3)That paragraph reads as follows: ' 15. Intends to set up, within three months of the adoption of this resolution, a special committee on the dissemination of criminal organisations which operate across borders, including mafias, one of whose aims will be to investigate the extent of the phenomenon and the negative social and economic impact it has throughout the EU, including the issue of the misappropriation of public funds by criminal organisations and mafias and their infiltration into the public sector, as well as the contamination of the legal economy and financial system, while another aim will be to identify a range of legislative measures in order to address this tangible and acknowledged threat to the EU and its citizens; calls, therefore, on the Conference of Presidents to put forward a proposal under Rule 184 of the Rules of Procedure‘.
Last updated: 21 March 2012Legal notice

Matt Taibbi on the Explosive Resignation of Goldman Sachs

Matt Taibbi on the Explosive Resignation of Goldman Sachs Executive Greg Smith
Button-taibbi-headshot
Financial reporter Matt Taibbi talks about Goldman Sach’s history of denigrating its own clients, as recently highlighted by former Goldman executive Greg Smith’s explosive resignation letter in the New York Times. Decrying what he called Goldman’s "toxic" culture, Smith said bosses at the firm called their clients "muppets" and strove to maximize profits at the expense of client interests, adding: "It makes me ill how callously people talk about ripping their clients off." Goldman Sachs is now reportedly scanning internal emails for the term "muppet" and other evidence that employees referred to clients in derogatory ways. "This gives ... people in the industry, institutional investors, tremendous pause: why would I want to do business with this company if this is their attitude towards me?" says Taibbi. "They’re thinking how much can they get out of me, and not how much money they can make for me." [includes rush transcript]
GUEST:
Matt Taibbi, contributing editor for Rolling Stone. He is the author of five books, most recently, Griftopia: Bubble Machines, Vampire Squids, and the Long Con That Is Breaking America. His latest article in Rolling Stone is titled "Bank of America: Too Crooked to Fail."

AMY GOODMAN: I want to go to the whole issue of Goldman Sachs now.
MATT TAIBBI: Sure.
AMY GOODMAN: The bank reportedly scanning internal emails for the term "muppet" and other evidence that employees referred to clients in derogatory ways. The decision was made after a Goldman executive named Greg Smith resigned last week and penned an explosive article about Goldman Sachs, an op-ed piece for the New York Times. Smith wrote, quote, "It makes me ill how callously people talk about ripping their clients off. Over the last 12 months I have seen five different managing directors refer to their own clients as 'muppets.'" He said Goldman had become, quote, "as toxic and destructive as I have ever seen it." He talks about them talking about ripping the eyes out of their muppets.
MATT TAIBBI: Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm.
AMY GOODMAN: So, talk about the significance of Glenn Smith’s—of Greg Smith’s both resignation and what this means.
MATT TAIBBI: Well, first of all, there are a lot of people who are saying this guy is a disgruntled employee, he’s got an ax to grind, so maybe he’s making all this stuff up. Everything that he said has—essentially, has already been confirmed in public documentation. There was a report by the Senator Levin a couple years ago where—they didn’t say "muppets," but there was a—they have internal emails where we saw Goldman employees saying, "We found a company that was so stupid to buy our product that they’re a flying pig, a white elephant and a unicorn all at once." They actually used that kind of terminology. So this history of them denigrating their own clients and celebrating ripping them off is already demonstrated, way before Greg Smith. But the significance of it is that it’s somebody from the company. And this gives, I think, people in the industry, institutional investors, tremendous pause: why would I want to do business with this company if this is their attitude towards me? They’re thinking how much can they get out of me, and not how much money they can make for me. That’s the problem.
JUAN GONZALEZ: I was troubled, however, when I read that op-ed piece that Smith almost seemed to be saying that at one time Goldman Sachs was an ethical company, and in recent years it’s had a shift, as if almost the current CEOand the current leadership was responsible for the problem. It seems to me it’s a little naïve to think that there was a golden era when Goldman Sachs was really a great—a great financial institution.
MATT TAIBBI: I’m sure Goldman was always a ruthless company. And definitely, if you go back to the '20s, they had a big part—you know, John Kenneth Galbraith writes about this in his book, The Great Crash, Goldman's role in the speculative boom that led to the Depression. But to give them credit, there was a time—and I knew people who worked at Goldman when I lived in Russia, and they had this credo in the company, which was "long-term greedy." In other words, we want to make money, but we want to make money for the long term. And I think that changed somewhere in the early ’90s to the early part of the last decade. They started grabbing the quick buck and gouging their clients, instead of looking for the long term.
AMY GOODMAN: And very quickly—we only have about 30 seconds—Goldman’s involvement in speculating on gas, gas prices?
MATT TAIBBI: Well, Goldman is the leading commodities—they have their—Goldman Sachs Commodities Index is the—is where everybody goes to speculate on commodities. So they’ve always been a leader in pushing up commodities booms, like in 2008 when the oil went to $149. Goldman always has a central role in that, them and Morgan Stanley. So, yes, whenever you see a big bump in gas prices, always look to those two banks.
AMY GOODMAN: Well, I want to thank you very much, Matt Taibbi, contributing editor fro Rolling Stone, author of five books, most recently, Griftopia: Bubble Machines, Vampire Squids, and the Long Con That Is Breaking America. His latest piece is in Rolling Stone; it’s called "Bank of America: Too Crooked to Fail."
When we come back, we’re going to Orlando, Florida, to speak with the NAACPpresident, Ben Jealous, about Trayvon Martin and the killer who is still free. Stay with us.

IMF Banksters worst fear: Egyptians to repudiate Mubarak's debt


IMF Banksters worst fear: Egyptians launch campaign to repudiate Mubarak's debt's

Mubarak contracted the debt so Mubarak should pay. Let the international banksters like IMF and WB who lent the money to Mubarak go collect it from him. Third world debt repudiation is the criminal banksters worst nightmare. Argentina did it successfully in the 90 and now there are Egypt, Pakistan Philippians even India is a possible candidate for debt repudiation

The Popular Campaign to Drop Egypt’s Debts

8 November 2011 by Popular Campaign to Drop Egypt’s Debt
The Popular Campaign to Drop Egypt’s Debts has the honour to announce the formation of a joint Egyptian-Tunisian committee for the Dropping of Debts in coordination with the campaign in Tunisia. The Campaign to Drop Tunisia’s Debt aims at auditing and dropping the debts of the dictator Bin Ali and was launched in the aftermath of the Tunisian revolution. This coordination between two popular Arab movements is a practical translation of the achievements of the Arab Spring.
Campaign to repudiate Egyptian debt
The joint committee shall work on the exchange of experience in the reviewing and auditing of debts; coordinating the two campaigns’ activities and organising relations globally. Such cooperation aims to cause the dropping of all odious, illegitimate external debts; which were amassed with foreign governments and international financial institutions by the corrupt regimes of Hosni Mubarak and Zine Al-Abidine Bin Ali.
Founding Statement
The Popular Campaign to Drop Egypt’s Debts was conceived as part of the January 25th Revolution, and affirms the right of the Egyptian people to assert collective control over all matters related to their life and the future of coming generations. This is a popular movement that aims to facilitate Egypt’s economic independence from the many forms of exploitation, subordination and resource misappropriation that were imposed upon the people of Egypt during the past decades by the regime of the ousted dictator Hosni Mubarak and his collaborators abroad.
The economic policies applied by Mubarak’s regime have left us with enormous internal and external debts. The regime borrowed extensively in order to pay off its debt premiums and interest. Real solutions would have entailed searching for alternative mechanisms to finance government expenditure – such as wealth and income taxes – towards the goal of creating a more just economy.
But instead of seeking ways to address the structural issues at stake, policymakers attempted to sustain a failing economic model by borrowing both internally and externally. The resulting debts have left the Egyptian people captive to lending countries and institutions.
IMF worst fear is third world debt repudiation.
The interest on these debts represents one of the biggest items of public expenditure in Egypt; this means that significant amounts of money are channeled towards already-wealthy financial institutions rather than toward guaranteeing that every Egyptian can achieve a dignified standard of life.
Decisions about the basic principles of the Egyptian economy have, for too long, been restricted to a select group of experts. It is time that the people reclaim the fundamental right to participate in determining their country’s economic priorities, for they are the first to be affected by economic policies and presently bear the burden of paying from their very own pockets for the mistakes of the previous regime. The transfer of power over economic policy from elites to the people must be an integral part of the democratic transformation in Egypt.
In the light of all these reasons, a group of civil society organizations and individual Egyptians concerned with the public good and with the future of social justice in the country have decided to launch a public campaign to pressure lending countries and institutions, both locally and internationally to drop Egypt’s debts.
The campaign demands that:
1) All loan agreements signed during Mubarak’s rule must be reviewed by an independent Egyptian commission that will evaluate the use of the loans and the degree to which the Egyptian people benefited from them. All debts that are determined to be illegitimate must then be dropped by the lending country/institution.
2) As a general rule, the campaign disapproves of debt swap mechanisms. Debt swaps create new debt burdens, whose legality and benefit are not checked by the people. In cases where debt swaps are used instead of audit and cancellation, the campaign adopts the following stands:
Debt agreements should be reviewed to determine the legitimacy of the swapped debts.  
The conditions of debt swap should be discussed in a manner that guarantees integrity and transparency in the decision-making process. 
3) Although the campaign does not approve of resorting to debts as a quick fix option, in case of any future loan agreements the campaign demands that:
 All contracts and conditions be subject to popular participation and discussion in a manner that guarantees transparency and accountability.  The legislature implements freedom of information laws that require full public disclosure of all contracts and other information related to loans and debts, with no exclusions save what is stated by law.
It gives us great honor to invite members of the Egyptian public and civil society organizations to join the Popular Campaign to Drop Egypt’s Debts. We invite you to support the Campaign’s agenda in order to preserve the gains of the Egyptian Revolution that enable the economy to be built in accordance with the will of the people, free of pressures imposed by economic colonization and the organized plunder of public money through debts.
Follow us on:
Twitter: @DropEgyptsDebt
Drop Egypt’s Debt  https://www.facebook.com/groups/232...
Page of the universal day for Egyptian External Debt Audit and Cancellation http://www.facebook.com/event.php?e...
To join or for more information, please contact us:
Samer Attallah: 0101162412 '; document.write(''); document.write(addy_text23597); document.write('<\/a>'); //-->\n
Amr Ismail: 0127793243 
amradly@eipr.org
Salma Hussein: 0123118939 salmaahussein@gmail.com

Related Articles


Its not his money anyway. The poor schmuck US tax payers don't count anyway.

US tax payers don't really mind if $185B was "lost" because it was for helping Israel.

Actually buying the whole country of Egypt with all its land, people, gas, suez and water for $3 billion is quite cheap.

giovedì 22 marzo 2012

mercoledì 21 marzo 2012

Creating Liquidity in Your Neighborhood


Creating Liquidity in Your Neighborhood & Networks

By Catherine Austin Fitts
Families and communities are struggling with significant currency debasement and ever more complex regulation which function as capital controls,  shutting off opportunity and liquidity to the average person.  What to do? Individually, we can reposition our personal and family assets. We can start businesses. The next step is to improve the transaction flow between individuals and business.
This Thursday we will speak with Thomas H. Greco, Jr., proprietor of Reinventing Money and author of New Money for Healthy Communities,  Money: Understanding and Creating Alternatives to Legal Tender  and The End of Money and the Future of Civilization. Tom has spent decades writing, researching and educating about the importance of providing alternatives to a financial system that is draining us. We will describe ideas that are working and how they might energize our efforts individually and in our neighborhood and networks.
I will start with Money & Markets and Ask Catherine. Post your questions in the comments section. In Let’s Go to The Movies, a review of Paul Grignon’s  animation series, “Money as Debt, I, II and III.”
Money As Debt – YouTube
Talk to you Thursday!