mercoledì 7 luglio 2010

BNP, a banca universale, rischio universale!

BNP, a banca universale, rischio universale!

Fonte articolo originale: http://www.solidariteetprogres.org/article6781.html

Traduzione e note a pié di pagina a cura di Nicoletta Forcheri

Stampalibera, – 5 luglio 2010 – 21:48

5 luglio 2010 (Nouvelle Solidarité) – Adesso sappiamo perché Michel Pébereau [1], presidente di BNP Paribas [2], semina il terrore nelle istituzioni francesi: se le autorità ristabilissero la separazione tra banche di deposito e speculazione, la BNP morirebbe all’istante. La situazione reale di questa banca senza macchia, si commenta da sola.

Secondo Charles Dereeper, ex broker di BNP diventato oggi giornalista economico, le tre grandi banche francesi «funzionano con un livello di rischio superiore a tantissimi hedge funds ». E la più minacciata, continua, è proprio quella di Pébereau : «BNP vanta un totale di debiti pari a 1940 miliardi di euro. Le sue riserve sono di circa 60 miliardi circa. L’effetto leva è di 32. Basterebbe un 3% di crediti incagliati perché la BNP fallisca» !

BNP è quindi un colosso dai piedi d’argilla che può solo sopravvivere racimolando liquidità a tutto spiano. Se il vostro consigliere BNP vi chiama per proporvi un investimento retribuito al 12%, non mostratevi sorpresi ma parlategli piuttosto del suo bilancio ! Ciononostante per BNP e consorelle, il migliore modo rimane ancora quello di servirsi dalle casse dello Stato [3]. Le nostre banche detengono 79 miliardi di euro di debito greco (cifra della Banca dei regolamenti internaionali BRI). La Francia di Sarkozy è stata la prima a promuovere freneticamente il “salvataggio” della Grecia (130 miliardi di euro). Ma il denaro non ha avuto il tempo di arrivare in Grecia che è subito ripartito nelle casse dei creditori internazionali del governo greco. Ed ecco salvate le banche! Grazie Nicolas, grazie Dominiqe [Strauss-Kahn] !

Le banche possono contare anche sull’amico Trichet, governatore della venerabile Banca centrale europea (BCE) che ha prestato loro 240 miliardi in 48 ore il 30 giugno e il 1 luglio, affinché potessero rimborsare i 442 miliardi che le dovevano !

Il ripristino della separazione tra banche di deposito e banche d’affari, previsto in Svizzera, Germania e Italia, è un elemento fondamentale. Le nostre banche universali non sopravviveranno al sistema, allora tanto vale smantellarle subito, salvaguardando le attività di deposito e di credito e buttando il resto degli attivi alla pattumiera.

Note

[1] Michel Pébereau è uomo di Frère, poiché è amministratore anche in numerose società del suo impero: Total, Lafarge, Pargesa Holding (oltre ad Axa, EADS NV e Saint Gobain)

[2] BNP PARIBAS controlla dal 2006 al cento per cento BNL, ed è la socia di Albert Frère in Suez Gaz de France, Total e le altre società del suo impero.

[3] BNP Paribas è detenuta al 17% dalla Francia, e in percentuali minori da Lussemburgo e Belgio (11,1%). La fusione tra BNP e Paribas era stata effettuata con l’aiuto di AXA. Ultimamente ha acquisito a un prezzo stracciato la banca Fortis, fallita fraudolosamente per colpa di Maurice Lippens, socio proglobalizzazione del presidente onorario del Bilderberg Davignon, in seguito alla decisione di acquisire ABN Amro, a un prezzo esorbitante. In seguito all’iniezione di denaro e parziale nazionalizzazione da parte dei tre paesi Belgio, Olanda e Lussemburgo, l’Olanda ha deciso di riprendersi ABN Amro olandese e la parte olandese di Fortis. Lo Stato ha quindi venduto – contrariamente al parere dei piccoli azionisti che si erano nel frattempo ritrovati con un pugno di mosche in mano- Fortis a BNP Paribas.

Nel consiglio di amministrazione costituito da 13 membri di BNP Paribas, figurano il presidente di Saint Gobain, quello di Renault, quello del consiglio di sorveglianza di Axa, quello del consiglio di sorveglianza di Thyssen Krupp, e i presidenti di altre società come la Scor, Medef, Pechel Industries, Air Liquide, Legrand.

News stories related to the World Bank and IMF

A selection of news stories related to the World Bank and IMF, brought to you by the Bretton Woods Project:

Let merit dictate IMF, World Bank heads, not race: Zuma
http://www.timeslive.co.za/business/article536277.ece/Let-merit-dictate-IMF-World-Bank-heads-not-race
The Times, 6 July 2010

Emerging markets consider capital controls to regulate speculative capital flows
http://www.voxeu.org/index.php?q=node/5267
VoxEU, 5 July 2010

Guyana - Bank forest projects critiised for failing indigenous people
http://af.reuters.com/article/worldNews/idAFTRE66220820100703
Reuters, 3 July 2010

I politici camerieri dei banchieri: perché?

Agenzia ABRUZZO Press, Chieti, 6 Luglio ‘10

Nel recente G8 il proponimento dei Capi di Stato di tassare le Banche non venne neppure preso in considerazione. Non è stato detto se ciò sia accaduto per espressa volontà dei politici o per esterni condizionamenti. La soluzione sembra corrispondere ad una logica: possono i camerieri imporre la propria volontà ai padroni?...

L’avvenimento ci ha riportato alla mente un articolo del compianto Prof. Giacinto Auriti che riproponiamo ai nostri lettori:


I politici camerieri dei banchieri: perché?

Giacinto Auriti


Vi sono delle parole che hanno un tal peso specifico che ci costringono a rileggere la storia


Quando Ezra Pound riecheggia il famoso messaggio concepito dal colonnello Jefferson: “I politici sono camerieri dei banchieri”, ci costringe innanzitutto a prenderne atto, in secondo luogo, ad evidenziarne le cause.

La ragione di questa clamorosa verità sta nel fatto che la Rivoluzione Francese non si è fermata “a metà” (secondo la abituale regola), ma ai “tre quarti”. Lo stato di diritto ha considerato, infatti, nel proprio ordine costituzionale, solo i tre poteri: legislativo, giurisdizionale ed esecutivo. Il quarto potere della sovranità monetaria se lo sono fagocitato nel silenzio le banche centrali, S.p.A. con scopo di lucro.

Poiché – come insegna l’antica saggezza marchigiana – “li quatrì fa piove l’acqua pe l’in su” (“i soldi fanno piovere l’acqua in salita”) ci si spiega perché le lobbies bancarie hanno assunto il comando di tutti gli stati costituzionali.

Tutti gli storici hanno interpretato i tempi dello stato di diritto come una forma di progresso, addirittura come una conquista di civiltà irrinunciabile spacciando per democrazia, l’usurocrazia. Nessuno ha avvertito la grave decadenza causato dal fatto che il portatore della moneta era stato surrettiziamente trasformato in debitore dei propri soldi.

Ecco perché dobbiamo completare la Rivoluzione Francese: La Sovranità Monetaria va attribuita allo Stato – come Quarto Potere Costituzionale – e tolta alla banca centrale. Non è più tollerabile che, in un c.d. stato di diritto, la funzione costituzionale della sovranità monetaria sia esercitata da una S.p.A. con scopo di lucro.

Non è vero che lo Stato costituzionale rappresenti un progresso rispetto alle monarchie cattoliche della Vecchia Europa. I re avevano tutti la sovranità monetaria perché battevano moneta e nessuno poteva essere “cameriere del banchiere”. Sono diventati camerieri solo quando hanno accettato in prestito dalle banche centrali S.p.A. la moneta-debito (c.d. nominale).

L’urlo del “ça ira” deve tornare sulle piazze, davanti alle sedi della Banche centrali e nei Tribunali. Ci dobbiamo riprendere la proprietà dei soldi nostri.


P.S – Settimanalmente riproporremo articoli scritti dall’insigne accademico Prof. Giacinto Auriti prima degli anni 2000, ancora oggi di grande attualità. Il prossimo articolo si intitola: «Ah ça ira, ça ira, ça ira!»

Use World Currency to Renounce the Debt!

Use World Currency to Renounce the Debt!







Henry Makow
InfoWars, July 6, 2010


bankers.jpg




A network of private bankers own the medium of exchange.


In upcoming years, cities, states & nations will have one overwhelming choice:

1. Renounce all debt created by bankers out of nothing, or due to compound interest. This is probably 50-80% of all government debt.

2. Or accept the unbearable burden and be willing accomplices in our enslavement and destruction.

The central banking cartel wants a one-world currency. We keep seeing reminders. For example, today we read, “The dollar is an unreliable international currency and should be replaced by a more stable system, the United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs said in a report released Tuesday.

What if that new currency was not based on central banking cartel (i.e. IMF) debt? What if most of the old debt was abolished?

THE BIG PICTURE

The human experiment is in danger of failure because our forefathers were too weak, feckless or corrupt to get money creation right.

Money has no inherent value. It is a medium of exchange like sea shells or beads. It is simply a convenient method for billions of people to exchange millions of disparate products and services.

Nobody can own a medium of exchange. It must be public.

But a network of private Illuminati families do own it. They produce the medium of exchange in the form of a debt to them. And they charge compound interest on this “debt” created out of thin air. We are being strangled by these debts.

They know this lucrative fraud is unsustainable unless they enslave mankind, mentally and spiritually, if not physically.

These Illuminati banking families have used their position to control all major corporations and governments. Do you know that it takes only 3-4% of shares to control most widely-held corporations? These corporations in turn buy the executives and politicians, pundits and professors that run the world for the bankers.

Everybody in a position of power and influence today is indirectly employed by these dynastic banking families. Their primary role, whether they understand it or not, is to protect the fraudulent credit system. They are traitors and collaborators, and as long as we support them, we are all complicit in our own destruction.

Our perception of reality is controlled by these bankers through ownership of the mass media. We see through “spectacles they arrange on our noses.”

ONE LIE IS THE BASIS OF THEM ALL

Mankind is living a lie because our currency is based on a fraud. Our history is really the story of how these bankers have set countries against each other in pointless wars in order to kill our best men and destroy and demoralize humanity. These wars are endemic because they create enormous profits and debts which are used to enslave us.

Illuminati bankers are financing the “insurgents” in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq. When will we understand that they have been waging a war on humanity for centuries?

We are being gender neutered in the same way horses are gelded, to be obedient to their owners.

We are being morally degraded, dumbed down and distracted to paralyze us. Many believe we are being poisoned by chem trails, fluoride or by drugs and foods. Certainly our minds and spirits are poisoned by the mass media.

They have unleashed a pernicious satanic conspiracy on humanity in the form of Communism in its many manifestations. Barack Obama and Elena Kagan are Communists. The Illuminati bankers are responsible for assassinating JFK, for 9-11 and probably for the Gulf of Mexico disaster. They are responsible for most of mankind’s woes.

To get back on course, we need to nationalize credit and money creation. We need to nationalize banks.

Who should own the medium of exchange, a private cartel or democratic governments?

If the bankers want a new currency, give it to them, as long as it is debt and interest-free and administered by a body that represents the best interests of humanity.

Then mankind can regain its path, and begin to fulfill its amazing promise.

Government and Economy Decline In Tandem

Government and Economy Decline In Tandem

leadimage

07/06/10 Tampa, Florida – I did not hear it, but I read that Ben Bernanke, chairman of the satanic Federal Reserve, admitted that “Our nation’s fiscal position has deteriorated appreciably since the onset of the financial crisis and the recession.”

Well, neither he nor the Federal Reserve are going to take any of the blame, even though they are solely responsible, and he says that the problem is the government’s fiscal position, as “The exceptional increase in the deficit has in large part reflected the effects of the weak economy on tax revenues and spending, along with the necessary policy actions taken to ease the recession and steady financial markets.”

No mention, of course, of the crucial role of the Federal Reserve, which was to create the money to create the boom, which created the bust, and now to create the money to bail everybody out so that we, as a nation, would have time to leisurely wait for some miracle to happen, sort of like at the end of old Grecian dramas where the plot has become so impossibly and hopelessly tangled up that the only solution was to resort to a “deus ex machina,” which is when a supernatural power comes roaring in and magically fixes everything, applause, applause, applause, curtain comes down, the actors take a bow and everybody goes home happy.

As if waiting for a deus ex machina was not enough, Bernanke then contradicts himself. In the first paragraph when he said that the fiscal position of the nation has “appreciably deteriorated,” which is code for “We’re Freaking Doomed In Spades (WFDIS)” because the American system of governments IS the economy!

In fact, the incestuous conglomeration of local, county, state and federal government is now so large that it, literally, is the economy when you combine local government spending and county government spending and state government spending and federal government spending, which collectively now spends slightly more than half of GDP! Half! And taxpayers pay them to employ 1-out-of-6 workers! And government supports half of the population consisting of the old, young, infirm and needy or greedy in some way or another.

Therefore, I postulate that since government, and those who depend on government spending, is the majority of the population, if the government is not doing well, then the economy is not doing well.

This is like when you were a kid and you learned that when mom isn’t happy, then nobody is going to be happy, or, if you are an adult, when the boss isn’t happy, then nobody is going to be happy, which happened to me just last week when my boss was waiting for me, in my office, when I dragged myself back from lunch two hours late, stinking of beer and pizza, mostly because I had dribbled a lot of each down the front of my shirt and pants.

For some strange reason, probably indicating drunkenness and/or mental illness, I decided, on the spot, that a good offense was preferable to a good defense. So I said to her, “What in the hell are YOU looking at?”

Well, it made her unhappy, and she subsequently made me unhappy. And while I am always ready to use things like this to prove, as if any more proof is needed, that people are naturally hateful to me and they are all out to get me, in this case I will merely use the point to prove that when the government is not happy, the economy is not happy, although this is immediately contradicted by that moron Ben Bernanke, of the Federal Reserve, who says that the economy is recovering! Hahaha!

In fact, he said that not only is the economy recovering, but it will continue to recover! Just listen to this: He actually said, “As the economy and financial markets continue to recover, and as the actions taken to provide economic stimulus and promote financial stability are phased out, the budget deficit should narrow over the next few years”! Hahahaha!

This makes me laugh out loud – hahahaha! – at the humorous, “Theater of the Absurd” quality of saying such a thing, sort of like Pollyanna on steroids and antidepressants! Hahaha!

Then he goes on “Even after economic and financial conditions have returned to normal,” which is a point in his remarks where I just couldn’t take any more of that crap, and my mind leapt to add “In your freaking dreams, Bernanke! Show me one time in all of history where some dirtbag government and its half-witted populace bankrupted themselves with printing, and then borrowing and spending, too much fiat money, for too long, and how printing, and then borrowing, more fiat money fixed everything! Just one! Hahahaha!”

Naturally, he does not acknowledge my rude interruption, and goes on, as if I was not even there, ignoring my rude taunting, by saying that it is still the government’s fault for borrowing and spending all the money that the Federal Reserve created, and that “in the absence of further policy actions, the federal budget appears to be on an unsustainable path. A variety of projections that extrapolate current policies and make plausible assumptions about the future evolution of the economy show a structural budget gap that is both large relative to the size of the economy and increasing over time.”

And what he will do is print the money the government needs, which will cause terrifying, bankrupting inflation in consumer prices, which should lead me to say that buying gold, silver and oil are the only things that will let you keep up, and probably make you a fortune in the process.

And sure enough, it did lead me there! Whee! This investing stuff is easy!

The Mogambo Guru
for The Daily Reckoning

IRTA International Convention Coming To Pennsylvania

IRTA International Convention Coming To Pennsylvania

The International Reciprocal Trade Association has announced details of its upcoming 31st annual international convention, with the timely theme of “Modern Barter, Leading the Way to Global Economic Recovery.” The event will be held October 28 through October 30, at Pittsburgh’s convenient downtown Hilton Hotel.

“We expect this convention to draw over 125 attendees representing more than 75 trade exchanges from all over the world,” offered IRTA Executive Director Ron Whitney. “We will feature nationally renowned and powerful speakers, with seminars on sales, modern brokering, social networking, media training, technology, community currency/time dollars and much more.”

“The ‘Modern Barter, Leading the Way to Global Economic Recovery’ conference theme will provide an excellent opportunity for us as an industry to demonstrate to the business and financial communities how the process of Modern Trade and Barter is on the leading edge of global economic recovery,” stressed IRTA President David Wallach.

Mike Krane, President of Greenapple Barter Services in Pittsburgh, asserted, “We are proud to be able to host this year’s IRTA convention and incredibly excited by the energy and buzz that has been created by the IRTA team. This will certainly be a convention that no one in the industry should miss.”

Prior to the convention, on Wednesday evening October 27, Greenapple Barter will be hosting their huge Trade Show at the Pittsburgh Convention Center. All IRTA convention attendee companies are invited to participate in this remarkable trading opportunity by taking a booth at the show, which will feature 150 vendors and 1,000 attendees.

For more info on the IRTA convention and registration go to www.irta.com, or e-mail Ron Whitney at ron@irta.com.

Il senso della vita: LA MONETA E' DEL POPOLO

TRSP: Il senso della vita: LA MONETA E' DEL POPOLO

video video

LA MONETA E' DEL POPOLO (TRSP - Lunedì 5 Luglio, ore 21.30)

IL SENSO DELLA VITA: LA MONETA E' DEL POPOLO (Lunedì 5 Luglio, ore 21.30)

Lunedì 5 Luglio, alle ore 21.30, TRSPradiotelevisione trasmetterà, nell’ambito del programma tv IL SENSO della VITA: LA MONETA E' DEL POPOLO. Le straordinarie teorie del professor Giacinto Auriti.

Ospiti in studio: Antonio Pimpini, Luciano Marrocco, Gianluca Monaco e Marco Solfanelli.

Conduce in studio Umberto Timmonieri

ITALIA: SKY 886
EUROPA: Hot Bird – 13° est- orizz. Frequ. 11179
STREAMING: http://www.trsp.tv/news/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=20&Itemid=49


www.umbertotimmonieri.info

martedì 6 luglio 2010

BNP : A banque universelle, risque universel !

BNP : A banque universelle, risque universel !

5 juillet 2010 (Nouvelle Solidarité) – L’on sait désormais pourquoi Michel Pébereau, président de BNP Paribas, sème la terreur dans les institutions françaises : si les autorités rétablissaient la séparation entre banques de dépôt et spéculation, la BNP mourrait aussitôt. La situation réelle de cette banque irréprochable parle d’elle-même.

Selon Charles Dereeper, ancien courtier chez BNP et aujourd’hui rédacteur économique, les trois grandes banques françaises « fonctionnent avec un niveau de risque supérieur à de très nombreux hedge funds ». Et la plus menacée, poursuit-il, c’est celle de M. Pébereau : « BNP a un total de dettes de 1940 milliards d’euros. Ses capitaux propres sont de 60 milliards environ. L’effet de levier est de 32. Il suffit de 3% de défauts de paiement avec aucun espoir de recouvrement pour que la BNP soit en faillite » !

BNP est donc un colosse aux pieds d’argile qui ne peut survivre qu’en engrangeant des liquidités tout azimut. Si votre conseiller de BNP vous appelle pour vous proposer un placement rémunéré à 12%, ne soyez pas surpris et parlez lui de son bilan ! Mais pour BNP et ses consœurs, le meilleur moyen reste de se servir dans les caisses de l’Etat. Nos banques détiennent 79 milliards d’euros de dette grecque (chiffre de la Banque des règlements internationaux – BRI). La France de Sarkozy a été la première à promouvoir frénétiquement le renflouement de la Grèce (130 milliards d’euros). Aussitôt l’argent arrivé en Grèce, il repart immédiatement dans les coffres des créanciers internationaux à qui le gouvernement grec avait emprunté. Voilà les banques renflouées ! Merci Nicolas, merci Dominique !

Les banques peuvent aussi compter sur leur ami Trichet, gouverneur de la vénérable Banque centrale européenne (BCE), puisqu’il leur a prêté 240 milliards en 48h les 30 juin et 1er juillet, afin qu’elles remboursent les 442 milliards qu’elles lui devaient !

Le retour à la séparation des banques de dépôts et des banques d’affaires, envisagé en Suisse, en Allemagne et en Italie, est un enjeu fondamental. Nos banques universelles ne survivront pas à ce système, alors autant les démanteler tout de suite, sauvegardant les activités de dépôt et de crédit, et balançant le reste de leurs actifs à la poubelle.

Faites circuler l'Appel pour une commission d'enquête sur la crise financière à vos amis

HSBC offshore accounts under investigation

HSBC offshore accounts under investigation by US tax authorities

HSBC account holders in America targeted as US justice department widens clampdown on tax evasion


Singapore financial district Raffles Place
The US government is investigating whether HSBC clients are hiding money offshore in undeclared accounts in Singapore, pictured, and India. Photograph: Roslan Rahman/AFP/Getty Images

The US government has begun a criminal investigation into whether clients of HSBC are evading tax by putting money in undeclared bank accounts in Singapore and India, widening a crackdown on offshore secrecy that began with a successful prosecution of Switzerland's UBS.

A senior official at the US department of justice, Kevin Downing, has written to certain US residents with accounts at HSBC asking for details of their offshore holdings.

The move has sparked speculation that HSBC has handed over clients' personal information to the authorities.

The US internal revenue service has been tightening the screw on alleged tax cheats who hide money overseas. Last year, UBS paid a $780m (£515m) fine and agreed to disclose the names of 4,450 account holders in a landmark softening of Switzerland's banking secrecy tradition.

HSBC refused to comment today. But Robert McKenzie, a tax lawyer at Arnstein & Lehr in Chicago, said several of his clients with HSBC offshore accounts had received enforcement letters.

"It appears there's been some compromise to the security of information at Asian HSBC branches," McKenzie told the Guardian. "I don't know whether HSBC has co-operated with the authorities."

He said the department of justice's action appeared to be a broadening of its attack on secret Swiss bank accounts: "I don't believe the US government's purpose is to give up after one victory. They're not going to stop here." International banks must strike a delicate balance in co-operating with increasingly aggressive investigations by US authorities while protecting customers' privacy. The government's foray into Swiss accounts caused a political storm in Bern and created a rift in US-Swiss relations.

In an effort to claw back some of the billions of dollars believed to be lost to the US through offshore banking, tax authorities offered a deal last year under which Americans who disclosed secret accounts could settle for an agreed penalty. US residents voluntarily disclosed 14,700 offshore accounts under the deal, ranging in value from $10,000 to more than $100m.

Marketing practices by banks offering offshore accounts have come under scrutiny. UBS was accused of sending staff to visit wealthy Americans to trumpet the virtues of private accounts. A former UBS employee turned whistleblower told a court he had even smuggled diamonds into the US on behalf of a client.

C Evan Stewart, a partner at law firm Zuckerman Spaeder in New York, said HSBC fell into a different category: "HSBC doesn't have the same sort of secrecy laws as the Swiss banks invoked – there will be a question of whether it was trying to market [secrecy] as a competitive advantage in the US."

Downing has made it clear he envisages broader prosecutions. He recently toured Singapore, Hong Kong and Beijing to meet regulators and bankers.

According to Bloomberg News, he told a conference of tax lawyers in New York last month that banks in Asia were well aware of the issue, saying: "Neither the banks nor the governments want to have a UBS-type situation. They want to do it nice and quiet. They don't want to be the focus of attention. The department of justice and IRS are devoting a ton of resources to this issue."

Just Give Money to the Poor?

Just Give Money to the Poor? A Surprisingly Effective Solution to Poverty

Half the world's population lives below the poverty line, despite extreme free-trade policies that were supposed to "lift all boats." It's time to try something new.

Who’s responsible for the poor?

Back in the reign of the first Queen Elizabeth, English lawmakers said it was the government and taxpayers. They introduced the compulsory “poor tax” of 1572 to provide peasants with cash and a “parish loaf.” The world’s first-ever public relief system did more than feed the poor: It helped fuel economic growth because peasants could risk leaving the land to look for work in town.

By the early 19th century, though, a backlash had set in. English spending on the poor was slashed from 2 percent to 1 percent of national income, and indigent families were locked up in parish workhouses. In 1839, the fictional hero of Oliver Twist, a child laborer who became a symbol of the neglect and exploitation of the times, famously raised his bowl of gruel and said, “Please, sir, I want some more.”

Today, child benefits, winter fuel payments, housing support and guaranteed minimum pensions for the elderly are common practice in Britain and other industrialized countries. But it’s only recently that the right to an “adequate” standard of living has begun to be extended to the poor of the developing world.

In an urgent new book, Just Give Money to the Poor: The Development Revolution from the Global South, three British scholars show how the developing countries are reducing poverty by making cash payments to the poor from their national budgets. At least 45 developing nations now provide social pensions or grants to 110 million impoverished families — not in the form of charitable donations or emergency handouts or temporary safety nets but as a kind of social security. Often, there are no strings attached.

It’s a direct challenge to a foreign aid industry that, in the view of the authors, “thrives on complexity and mystification, with highly paid consultants designing ever more complicated projects for ‘the poor’” even as it imposes free-market policies that marginalize the poor.

“A quiet revolution is taking place based on the realization that you cannot pull yourself up by your bootstraps if you have no boots,” the book says. “And giving ‘boots’ to people with little money does not make them lazy or reluctant to work; rather, just the opposite happens. A small guaranteed income provides a foundation that enables people to transform their own lives.”

There are plenty of skeptics of the cash transfer approach. For more than half a century, the foreign aid industry has been built on the belief that international agencies, and not the citizens of poor countries or the poor among them, are best equipped to eradicate poverty. Critics concede that foreign aid may have failed, but they say it’s because poor countries are misusing the money. In their view, the best prescription for the developing world is a dose of discipline in the form of strict “good governance” conditions on aid.

Tribunale di Bergamo: aule "DEDICATE"

Letto oggi sulla targa della Prima Aula Penale del Tribunale di Bergamo:

AULA DI CORTE D'ASSISE
REALIZZATA CON IL CONTRIBUTO DELLA
FONDAZIONE
CREDITO BERGAMASCO

The Atlantic Partnership

The Vatic Project, 2010-07-05

The Atlantic Partnership - Here Come the British Again!!!!

Atlantic Partnership- Here Come the British Again!!!!
That includes the Rothschilds which explains the Gulf and corexit (those involved are the same old
players we are used to harming this nation)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Palmerparteram/Atlantic_Partnership

User:Palmerparteram/
Document last modified July 4, 2010 - keep this fact in mind as you read this blog.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, contributed to Vatic Project by Robert DeBeero

The Atlantic Partnership is an NGO, which seeks to continue the strong influence of America in the development of the European Union, through the agency of the United Kingdom as the spokesman for American interest. This strategy represents a continuation of the policy of America towards Europe established during the Second World War and the Cold War.

The Atlantic Partnership was founded immediately after the September 11 attacks in the United States. The founding of the organization was timed to ensure that America and Europe did not drift apart as the former pursued the “War on Terror” and the latter pursued monetary and political unification and expansion. Lord Powell of Bayswater (the Chairman of the Atlantic Partnership) opines this strategy clearly in the “Aims and Objectives” section of the organization’s website; when he says

“Partnership’s role is to argue the case for setting major policy decisions in the context of their impact on transatlantic relations. That should apply as much to the way America pursues the global war against terrorism as to the European Union’s ambition to build stronger, Europe-wide institutions.”

Until the time of writing of this article, the Atlantic Partnership and its work have been widely ignored by the media and the public, however its impact since inception in 2002 has been enormous.

Atlantic Partnership People

Chairmen • Lord Powell of Bayswater - Chairman • Ambassador Richard Burt - Managing Director, McLarty Associates • The Rt Honorable Michael Howard QC MP - President and Founding Chairman • The Honorable James P. Rubin - Vice Chairman, USA • Secretary William Cohen - Co-Chairman USA • Senator Sam Nunn - Co-Chairman USA • Pierre Lellouche - Vice Chairman, France • Ambassador Francois Bujon d’Estang - Vice Chairman, France

Patrons

Henry Kissinger - Chairman of Kissinger Associates, Inc. (Indicted War Criminal) • Senator John McCain - United States Senator for Arizona • General Colin L. Powell - Former United States Secretary of State • The Rt Honorable John Major CH - Former United Kingdom Prime Minister • The Rt Honorable Lord Robertson of Port Ellen - Former Secretary General of NATO • Alain Juppé • The Rt Honorable Lord Gilbert - Life Peer, House of Lords • Herr Karsten Voigt - Coordinator for German-American Cooperation • Sr. Eduardo Serra - Former Defense Minister of Spain • Senator Antonio Martino - Minister of Defense of Italy

Trustees

• The Rt Honorable Michael Howard QC MP - President and Founding Chairman • Lord Marland of Odstock - Treasurer • Lord Powell of Bayswater - Chairman • Lord Chadlington of Dean - Life Peer, House of Lords • Meg Allen - Director of DRAMLA SA, Geneva • Sir Evelyn de Rothschild - Chairman, E.L. Rothschild Ltd • Sir David Manning GCMG, CVO • Ambassador Richard Burt - Managing Director, McLarty Associates • General Brent Scowcroft - President of The Scowcroft Group

Friends of Atlantic Partnership US

• Ambassador Richard Burt - Managing Director, McLarty Associates • John R. Drexel IV - Chairman, Sage Advisors • James Lyle - Chief Investment Officer, Millgate Capital • James P. Rubin, Adjunct Professor, Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs • General Brent Scowcroft - President of The Scowcroft Group • Leo M. Tilman - President, L.M.Tilman & Co. • Daniel Yergin - Chairman, Cambridge Energy Research Associates

Panelists

• Ed Heathcoat Amory - Political Commentator, The Daily Mail • Matthew d’Ancona - Editor, The Spectator • Ronald Asmus - Executive Director of the Transatlantic Center of the German Marshall Fund of the US in Brussels • Elle Beard - Project Manager, USA • Sr Boris Biancheri - President of ANSA (news services) • Doug Bereuter - President and CEO of The Asia Foundation • Dr. Christoph Bertram - Head of the Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik • Ryan Carroll - Project Manager, USA • Professor Malcolm Chalmers - University of Bradford • Patrick Chamorel - Visiting Fellow, Hoover Institution, Stanford University (VN: A tavistock funded institution) • Derek Chollet - Senior Fellow, The Center for a New American Security (CNAS) • Professor Michael Clarke - King’s College London, Director of the Council of the Royal United Services Institute • Amy Cohen - Former AP Project Manager, USA • Maggie Smith - Former Project Manager, USA • Laurent Cohen-Tanugi - Political Writer, Partner Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton • Jean de Courcel - Former Directeur-Adjoint to the Prime Minister • Jonathan Delaney - Former Project Manager, USA • Catherine Fall - Former Associate Director • Niall Ferguson - Professor of History at Harvard University • The Rt Honorable Frank Field MP - United Kingdom Member of Parliament, Labour • Klaus-Dieter Frankenberger - Foreign Editor , Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung • David Frum - Resident Fellow, American Enterprise Institute • Ulf Gartzke - Director of the Hanns-Seidel-Foundation in Washington • Dr. Jeffrey Gedmin - President, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty • The Rt Hon Lord Gilbert - Life Peer, House of Lords • Renaud Girard - Foreign Affairs Correspondent, Le Figaro • Daniel Hamilton - Professor and Director of the Center for Transatlantic Relations at Johns Hopkins University • Lord Howell – Conservative Front Bench spokesman House of Lords • Field Marshal The Lord Inge - Former Chief of the Defence Staff • Dr. Josef Joffe - Editor, Die Zeit • Professor Sir John Keegan - Historian and Columnist, Daily Telegraph Defence • Thomas Kielinger - London Correspondent, Die Welt • Dr. Sophie Meunier - Research Scholar, Woodrow Wilson School, Princeton University • Sir Christopher Meyer - Chairman, Press Complaints Commission. Former British Ambassador to Washington • Leo Michel - Senior Research Fellow, Institute for National Strategic Studies • John Micklethwait - United States Editor, The Economist • Eric Mittereder - Former AP Project Manager, USA • Dominique Moisi - Director, Institute of Foreign Relations (IFRI), Paris • Nicolas de la Moriniere - Chairman and Chief Executive of ODIOT • Jean-Pierre Mulot - Directeur Delegue de la Redaction, Le Figaro • Sophie Simonard-Norman - Former Associate Director • George Osborne MP - United Kingdom Member of Parliament for Tatton • John O’Sullivan - Editor, The National Interest • Dr. John Van Oudenaren - Chief, European Division, Library of Congress • Lord Owen - Crossbench Peer, former United Kingdom Foreign Secretary • Owen Pengelly - Former Associate Director • Senator Jean-Francois Poncet - Former French Foreign Secretary • Axel Poniatowski MP - Deputy, French National Assembly • Lord Renwick - Labour Peer, former Ambassador to the United States • Sir Malcolm Rifkind - Former Foreign Secretary, Former Defence Secretary • Andrew Roberts - Author and journalist • Douglas Seay - Senior Staff Member of the Committee on International Relations, United States House of Representatives • Dr. Simon Serfaty - Director, Europe CSIS, Washington, DC • Radek Sikorski - Minister of Foreign Affairs for Poland • Angela Stent - Director of the Center for Eurasian, Russian and East European Studies, Georgetown School of Foreign Service • Jean-Daniel Tordjman - Inspecteur General des Finances • Martin Walker - Editor in Chief - UPI (Washington DC) • Professor Dr. Norbert Walter - Chief Economist, Deutsche Bank Group • Professor Dr. Werner Weidenfeld - Director of the Centre for Applied Research • Sir John Weston - Former Ambassador to NATO and to the United Nations • Dr. David R. Young - Managing Director & Founder, Oxford Analytica

Contents

1 Controversies Surrounding the Atlantic Partnership
1.1 The Connection to Diligence LLC
1.2 The Connection to the Rothschild Family
1.3 Involvement in the United States Presidential Election of 2008 and American Politics
1.4 Involvement in the British Parliamentary Election of 2009 and British Politics
1.5 Connections to personnel involved in Operation Desert Storm and Operation Iraqi Freedom
1.6 “Yachtgates”
1.6.1 “Yachtgate I: Montenegro 2006”
1.6.2 “Yachtgate 2: Corfu 2008”
1.6.3 “Yachtgate 3: Alaska & San Diego 2008”
1.7 Connection to Henry Kissinger

Controversies Surrounding the Atlantic Partnership

The Connection to Diligence LLC

Diligence LLC is a private intelligence company with a controversial history in Russia and Iraq.
The Advisory Board of Diligence LLC is chaired by Sir Michael Howard, the President and Founder of the Atlantic Partnership.

Lord Powell of Bayswater, Chairman of the Atlantic Partnership is also an advisory board member of Diligence LLC.

Ambassador Richard Burt, Chairman of the Atlantic Partnership, is also an advisory board member of Diligence LLC. Ambassador Burt is also a Managing Director of McLarty Associates. McLarty and Associates was founded by Thomas F. “Mack” McLarty, former Chief of Staff to President Clinton. McLarty Associates then became Kissinger McLarty Associates through partnership with Kissinger Associates. Thomas F. McLarty is an advisory board member of Diligence LLC.

The Connection to the Rothschild Family

Jacob Rothschild and his son Nathaniel “Young Nate” Rothschild became major shareholders in Diligence LLC in 2006, through their vehicle JNR, which acquired Ambassador Richard Burt’s stake in the company.

Evelyn de Rothschild is a Trustee of the Atlantic Partnership.
Involvement in the United States Presidential Election of 2008 and American Politics

Senator John McCain is a Patron of the Atlantic Partnership. In March of 2008, Senator McCain was supported in his bid for the United States Presidency by Lord Jacob and Nathaniel “Young Nate” Rothschild. http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/apr/29/johnmccain.uselections2008

Lynn Forester de Rothschild, wife of Sir Evelyn de Rothschild (a Trustee of the Atlantic Partnership), changed her allegiance from the Democratic Party to the Republican Vice Presidential candidate Sarah Palin after Hilary Clinton lost the Democratic Presidential nomination.

The Honorable James P. Rubin is an economic and political adviser to President Barrack Hussein Obama. Rubin is Vice Chairman of the Atlantic Partnership.

Involvement in the British Parliamentary Election of 2009 and British Politics

British Chancellor George Osborne, is a Panelist of the Atlantic Partnership. Osborne, was the subject of an event referred to as “Yachtgate” involving the Rothschild Family, Russian Oligarch Oleg Deripaska and Labour Minister Peter Mandelson in 2008.

Connections to personnel involved in Operation Desert Storm and Operation Iraqi Freedom

Former British Prime Minister John Major, the replacement for Margaret Thatcher, was the British Prime Minister who led the country at the time of Operation Desert Storm. Major is a Patron of the Atlantic Partnership.

General Colin Powell was the Chairman of the Joint Chief’s of Staff at the time of Operation Desert Storm. In 2003, Secretary of State Powell made the case for the invasion of Iraq, based on the presence of WMD’s, to the United Nations. Powell is a Patron of the Atlantic Partnership.

Former British Ambassador, Sir David Manning was the author of the famous “Manning Memo” that outlined the details of a meeting between Tony Blair and George H. W. Bush in the run up to the 2003 invasion of Iraq. From 2001 to 2003, Manning was the political advisor to Prime Minister Tony Blair. Manning is a Trustee of the Atlantic Partnership.

Former British Ambassador Sir Christopher Meyer, who preceded Sir David Manning, is a Panelist of the Atlantic Partnership. Meyer was the Ambassador to the United States at the time of September 11 and was replaced with Sir David Manning when the policy to invade Iraq was executed.

[edit] “Yachtgate I: Montenegro 2006”

Senator John McCain (a Patron of the Atlantic Partnership) received the hospitality of the Oligarch Oleg Deripaska aboard Deripaska’s yacht on his seventieth birthday. Present at this celebration was Nathaniel “Young Nate” Rothschild, who went on to host a dinner for McCain at Spencer House in London to garner British support for McCain’s Presidential bid in 2008.

[edit] “Yachtgate 2: Corfu 2008”

The Oligarch, Oleg Deripaska met Labour Minister Peter Mandelson and UK Chancellor George Osborne (Panelist of the Atlantic Partnership) at the Rothschild family villa in Corfu in the summer of 2008. At this gathering, it was reported in the press that Deripaska was pressed for funding of the Conservative Party by Osborne.

[edit] “Yachtgate 3: Alaska & San Diego 2008”

In the summer of 2008, the Republican Candidates McCain and Palin met with the Russian Oligarchs Suleiman Kerimov and Oleg Deripaska on board Kerimov’s yacht Ice at Ketchikan (Alaska) and San Diego.

Present at these meetings was Oscar Wyatt III. Wyatt was the former owner of Bayoil which partnered with Kerimov’s Nafta Moskva in the Iraq Oil for Food Scandal.

[edit] Connection to Henry Kissinger

Henry Kissinger has been associated with controversy since his time in the Nixon administration to the present day. Kissinger is a Patron of the Atlantic Partnership.

Retrieved from " http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Palmerparteram/Atlantic_Partnership "

lunedì 5 luglio 2010

July 4th 2010 MESSAGE from the AMI

July 4th 2010 MESSAGE from the AMI


Dear Friends of the American Monetary Institute,


Hopefully you've celebrated this July 4th Independence Day in good style. AMI people went to Chicago's Oak Street Beach. We kept an upbeat attitude, despite the serious problems our nation faces.

We remembered the importance
to peoples around the earth, of our forefathers declaring independence from old world tyranny. We inspired a revolution in France. Later, thanks to France's gift, our Statue of Liberty served as a beacon inviting peoples to our shores; including my parents and grand parents from Italy. They achieved the American Dream - owning a home and educating their kids.

Our Constitution and Bill of Rights provided some safeguards and checks and balances that held anti-democratic and anti-human forces at bay, and separated government from religion, the misuse of which had caused so much pain in the old world. But unfortunately, because the founders as a group did not understand the nature of money, they allowed corrupt monetary beliefs and practices of the old world to gain a foothold on our shores, starting with the establishment of the privately owned 1st Bank of the U.S. in 1791 (detailed in Ch. 15 of The Lost Science of Money book). As with all major banking legislation here, fraud was involved.

This privatization of the money power is an "original sin" of our system, from which most of our social problems arise. Though the Constitution expressly forbade the establishment of an Aristocracy here, my neighbor President Martin Van Buren would write “The MONEY POWER (he always capitalized it)... when firmly established, was destined to become the only kind of an Aristocracy that could exist in our political system.” That aristocracy, through concentration of wealth and power and various financial tricks, is in the process of destroying the checks and balances which had offered protection. Witness the recent Supreme Court ruling allowing corporations to finance and thereby control elections.

Economists willingly embraced the pernicious errors allowing the financial establishment to control our nation, by confusing credit for money. WHY? Salaries and position, and tenure:
“What makes all doctrines plain and clear? About two hundred pounds a year. And that which was proved true before, proved false again? Two hundred more.” - Samuel Butler’s Hudibras on Economics said it all.

Clearly, "economics" is a failed profession, with rare and sometimes great individual exceptions. Indeed, Jamie Galbraith in testimony before the Senate Judicial Committee, Subcommittee on Crime, recently wrote: "I write you as a member of a disgraced profession" and he suggested they put the fear of Congress into the financial operators who brought down the world economy. But in general, economists focusing on theoretical, mathematically dominated thinking, ignoring factual results, are unable to make course corrections to public policy. And too many Congressmen, including the financial committees leadership, were too close to the economic wreckers to propose real reform.

The financial "reforms" they are arguing over now do not fundamentally address the main problem - a privatized money system based on using private credit instead of government money. This special privilege always leads to an obscene concentration of wealth, which then can overcome the regulations.

Thus at the recent meeting of G20 countries, they proposed a double-whammy to kick the World's economies while they're down, calling for "fiscal consolidation" and 're-capitalization' of banks. Both would have the effect of putting less money into the economy while taking more money out of the economy - and they're so deluded, they claim to be expecting 'growth' to come from these conditions of monetary drought and deflation. Along with that recurring delusion, we see the ongoing illusion that the 'remedy' for debt-ridden citizens, businesses and governments is to load them up with more debt(!) We say "deluded" as the only other explanation would be that they're deliberately trying to collapse the economies.

NEW ITEMS AT THE AMI WEBSITE
The American Monetary Act (here) is legislation which fundamentally reforms the private CREDIT system now wrecking our nation, replacing it with a government MONEY system. The act is in the final stages of development. We suggest you especially read through the "Findings" and "Purposes" section again at the beginning of the Act.

Summarizing how the Act achieves its purposes:
The Federal Reserve becomes incorporated into the U.S. Treasury. Banks no longer have the accounting privilege of creating our money supply. All their previously issued credit is converted into U.S. Money through an elegant and gentle accounting change, which has been described as brilliant by a former officer of the NY Fed. The banks are held accountable for this conversion. New money is then introduced by the government spending it into circulation for infrastructure, starting with the $2.2 trillion the engineers tell us is needed to properly maintain our infrastructure over the next 5 years. Infrastructure will include the necessary human infrastructure of health care and education.

Banks are encouraged to continue lending as profit making companies, but are no longer allowed to create our money supply through their loan making activity.

Thus, The American Monetary Act nationalizes the money system, not the banking system. Banking is absolutely not a proper function of government, but providing the nation’s money supply is a key function of government. No one else can do it properly. Talk of nationalizing the banking business may really act like a poison pill or diversion to block real reform.

MORE BLOG ARTICLES AND REVIEWS OF CURRENT WORKS AND IDEAS ON MONEY
Our new webmaster urges us to blog more, and so we start today with Dick Distelhorst's new article entitled "The Blueprint for Prosperity for All." Read it from our home page and post your comments (http://www.monetary.org). New articles will follow regularly. We'll be adding more reviews of monetary books and ideas on the homepage now. Three more are in the works with AMI Chapter leaders. Check back to the review section every so often to see whats new.

LAST YEARS JULY 4TH MESSAGE was so well received and forwarded by others that we attach it to this email also.

REMEMBER THE EARLY CONFERENCE REGISTRATION DISCOUNT DATE IS JULY 18 - SAVE $120!!!
Postmark your application by July 18th and get a discount on the
6th Annual AMI Monetary Reform Conference - $275 instead of $395! See the application and conference description at http://www.monetary.org/2010conference.html
The Conference is shaping up really well. As always a great line up of speakers will address us. Developing into an outstanding moment in monetary history!

Warm regards,

Stephen Zarlenga
Director
224-805-2200

Crisi dell'Euro e smantellamento dell'Unione Europea

Crisi dell'Euro e smantellamento dell'Unione Europea
di Jean Claude Paye - 05/07/2010

Fonte: eurasia






La crisi dell’euro è il risultato di un attacco mirato da parte delle agenzie di rating statunitensi Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s e Fitch contro il debito della Grecia, della Spagna e del Portogallo. L’abbassamento dei conti di questi tre paesi da parte delle agenzie americane, soprattutto per quanto riguarda quelli della Grecia, relegati nella categoria degli investimenti speculativi, è la conseguenza di un’azione mirata.

Quest’abbassamento fa seguito ad una serie di decisioni ripetute e molto ravvicinate. Questi attacchi sono stati appoggiati dall’apparato statale statunitense, in particolare dalle dichiarazioni allarmiste del consigliere economico del presidente Obama, ex presidente della Federal Reserve, Paul Volker che ha parlato di una futura disintegrazione della zona euro.


Quest’offensiva contro l’euro è innanzitutto un’azione destinata a portare negli Stati Uniti i capitali esteri necessari alla copertura del crescente deficit della bilancia finanziaria degli USA. È un segnale di avvertimento a paesi come la Cina, che aveva iniziato a riequilibrare le sue riserve di valute acquistando in euro anziché in dollari. Per gli Stati Uniti, c’è in effetti una certa urgenza in materia. Fino al 2009, il finanziamento dei loro deficit e la difesa del dollaro erano assicurati da un saldo positivo dei flussi finanziari. Ma, durante questo stesso anno, se il movimento dei capitali rimaneva positivo, esso non arrivava più a compensare i deficit. Il saldo diventò negativo per un ammontare di 398 miliardi di dollari. A livello puramente economico, l’offensiva contro l’euro e della stessa linea di quella contro la lotta alla frode fiscale, iniziata dal presidente Obama nel 2009. Si tratta di portare i capitali nella cerchia degli USA.

Quest’azione tattica si sdoppia in un’operazione strategica, quella di un movimento di smantellamento dell’Unione Europea a vantaggio di un’unione economica che copre i due continenti, in cui il progetto di creazione di un grande mercato transatlantico ne è la manifestazione più visibile. È in funzione di questo secondo obiettivo che si può comprendere l’atteggiamento della Germania che, sia per la lotta alla frode fiscale che per l’attacco contro l’euro, ha fornito un sostegno all’offensiva statunitense. Questo doppio atteggiamento è coerente con l’impegno privilegiato di questo Stato europeo nella realizzazione di un’unione economica transatlantica.

L’Unione Europea è stata costruita attorno la Germania e strutturata secondo i suoi interessi. Paese economicamente il più competitivo al momento dell’installazione del grande mercato, ha potuto, senza vincoli politici, senza governo economico e trasferimenti importanti verso le zone sfavorite, giocare pienamente i suoi vantaggi economici comparativi. Fino a quest’anno, la zona euro assorbe i tre quarti delle esportazioni tedesche. La Germania, dalle dichiarazioni dei suoi responsabili politici e dei suoi banchieri, così come dalla ripetuta ostentazione delle sue esitazioni, ha contribuito all’efficacia dell’offensiva contro l’euro. Per lei, i benefici di quest’azione sono immediati. Il calo della moneta comune permette di aumentare le esportazioni fuori dalla zona euro. In più, questo paese può meglio finanziare i suoi propri deficit. La crisi e la fuga verso la qualità che essa genera permettono alle obbligazioni tedesche di piazzarsi con un tasso di interesse ridotto.

Se, a lungo termine, la Germania dà l’impressione di tagliare il ramo su cui è seduta, vuol dire che ha deciso di cambiare ramo e che vuole inserirsi in un insieme più grande: il grande mercato transatlantico. La « costruzione europea » è ad un incrocio. Se fino ad ora, ha permesso uno sviluppo permanente della Germania, tale processo non più continuare secondo le stesse modalità. La UE non può uscire dalla crisi senza mettere in atto un governo economico che gestisca una politica economica comune, un’armonizzazione dello sviluppo e, per questo, senza assicurare dei conseguenti trasferimenti finanziari verso i paesi e le regioni sfavoriti. Una tale gestione politica è in completo disaccordo col semplice patto di stabilità promosso dalla Germania. La politica di bilancio di diminuzione accelerata dei deficit imposta nuovamente in nome di questo patto si farà a scapito del potere di acquisto delle popolazioni e non può realizzarsi senza una recessione economica. La zona euro non può più essere la sbocco privilegiato delle esportazioni tedesche. La Germania ha fatto la sua scelta: il grande mercato transatlantico e il mercato mondiale.

In luogo di ristrutturare il debito dei paesi deboli, cosa che avrebbe portato le banche a versare la loro parte, l’Europa ha messo in piedi due fondi di intervento. I 110 miliardi di euro di aiuto alla Grecia, così come i 750 miliardi di prestiti e garanzie, hanno come fine quello di sottomettere i paesi ricevitori alle condizioni del FMI, in cui gli USA hanno la maggioranza dei diritti di voto. In caso di depressione o anche di stagnazione economica, la politica di consolidamento delle spese pubbliche è votata al fallimento. I 750 miliardi previsti di aiuto serviranno a rimborsare le banche a scapito del potere di acquisto del contribuente e questo versamento alle istituzioni finanziarie aumenterà di molto la recessione.

La costruzione europea è stata imposta dagli Stati Uniti che, dopo la guerra, ne hanno fatto una condizione per le concessioni degli aiuti del Piano Marshall. È stata realizzata attorno la Germania, i cui interessi immediati erano complementari a quelli degli USA. L’attacco contro l’euro e l’operazione di smantellamento dell’Unione Europea risultano anche da un’offensiva lanciata dagli USA a cui ha dato il cambio la prima economia del vecchio continente, e ugualmente le istituzioni della UE. La Commissione e il Consiglio confermano così la loro partecipazione alla decomposizione dell’Unione ed alla sua integrazione in una nuova struttura politica ed economica transatlantica sotto la direzione americana, un ruolo già ricoperto attraverso i negoziati degli accordi sul trasferimento dei dati personali dei cittadini europei verso gli USA e sulla creazione di un grande mercato comprendente i due continenti.

Jean-Claude Paye, sociologo, autore de La fine dello Stato di diritto (Manifestolibri). Su “Eurasia” ha pubblicato Spazio aereo e giurisdizione statunitense (nr. 4/2007), Gli scambi finanziari sotto controllo USA (nr. 1/2009), La gerarchizzazione del sistema finanziario (nr. 1/2010).

Traduzione a cura di MATTEO SARDINI

Tante altre notizie su www.ariannaeditrice.it

From conspiracy theorists to conspiracy watchers

Mon July 5 www.rense.com

Some Americans -- me for one and largely thanks to early reading of rense.com -- and others around the world like this new international champion of populism Adrian Salbuchi, realize that full scale war is being waged against us, with infiltration having captured key positions to manage our lives in ways tending toward plunder of our household wealth and now more and more confronting us with slavery-or-death alternatives looking more like death-or-death alternatives. (I wonder if Y2K scare was used for information gathering on what systems for provisioning ourselves in an emergency they needed to subvert when the time came for them to pull the plug on the economy. They were behind it and it served no purpose that I can see, unless perhaps to draw attention away from the fact that our standards of living and our level of technology for the average household was far below what was being predicted in the 40's, 50's, 60's and early 70's.)

The big questions for us now are how to win real freedom and avoid massive bloodshed and/or starvation in getting it done. It is the problem of how to get everyone to resist all at once -- so the world conspiracy will have no secure base from which to retaliate -- (of course they will always have Israel) -- and to resist with one purpose, one agreed-upon reform for remedy -- with general agreement on the shape of systems to replace the sabotaged institutions and the long-standing instruments of enslavement that we have so long been tricked into thinking are necessary furnishings of a free society.

Their plan, contrary to our goals, is to play group against group -- oil/.methane refuges from the south overwhelming already depressed economies in the north; hispanic versus 'ourpanic' in the southwest and west -- middle against lower class in the war for redistribution (the poor envy the middle class they see -- not the super rich whom they do not see and who are responsible for all the misery of all non-elites -- so that we destroy each other before they move in to repopulate with more "respecting people" who have no notions of freedom or limited government or the power of the Money Power.

The automatic tax increase. The opening of doors to Mexico but with sending them to Junior Colleges for indoctrination without letting them take jobs. Caps and taxes on how much industry can breathe/combust oxygen. Increased export of our military equipment which is really going to China -- with our soldiers in Afghanistan and Iraq merely to kill Moslems, to be killed themselves, and to be far from the nation that needs defending.

Every penny of "investment" and "stimulus" that is not taken out of the country or lining criminal pockets is going to actual dismantling of real capital infrastructure -- who is going to fire up a steel mill with wind power?

We see dams being taken down that have been providing us with power for decades taken down for the sake of salmon that are not in danger. etc.

I look where I am and I see a constricting circle of where I can reach the way I am going about it -- any thoughts about where I should put limited time to extend reach: Skype, facebook, blogs, Facebook a website. I want to talk to lower middle class and poor who have never heard of you and me, also East Asian Americans who have been lying low in all this -- the people who have lost jobs and businesses and see no future -- but not usual college educated over-intellectualizers who debate for recreation, or the the usual tea-party, Beck, Ron Paul malpractice gold remedies, or the, closer to home, Tarpley, Celente, Clif High doom-as-fate crowd -- I see these three as Fetzers or as independent false-prophets seeking profit from selling fatalistic doom predictions -- despite their high percentage of accuracy in diagnosis -- stating the obvious and making safe bets -- without a thought of fixing the problem -- just what to expect as it all inevitably happens. If they are not working for the enemy then the enemy would have find someone to fill their position. They need hopeless to condition helpless.

Each of these doomsayers is stuck in the endogenous variables, (Clif High -- why the fake name? -- claiming special command over them through his "bot" data collection capabilities) , endogenous variables being the system that is within an outside controlling system.

The endogenous variables -- variables controlling from outside -- are a complex of inter-relationships among variables that are in play because people in a hidden exterior control room are autonomously (without being answerable) manipulating hidden from-outside (exogenous) variables that control where the endogenous system of variables will tend. The outside system makes the inside system perform as it does -- but the mutual control of variables that are endogenous cannot control the exogenous variables that are determining their endogenous fate. The exogenous realm is where you get to play Sim City with the endogenous world, where you get to play God. It is the place where the policies are set which CFR and Bilderberg operatives, with one way accountability, then impose and manage free of counter-control by any endogenous agency.

Thus the Bilderberg and the CFR and the other channels of elite control are the interface between exogenous elite-world controls and our limited set of endogenous control variables (voting, writing to the editor, running for office, starting a business, demonstrating, petition drives, or giving our tiny ration of purchasing power to good causes) which have no effect on influencing the autonomous top-down control exercised by the Rothschild interests.

They set the parameters and constraints of the system that we know and try to function in. Exogenous controls being bribery of officials, organized white-collar crime, secret club solidarity in conspiracy, infiltration of operatives working autonomously, that is, working under exogenous orders that override exogenous controls that control us.

Our laws in the endogenous system does not even recognize as crimes the infliction of damage on us caused by manipulation of exogenous variables in the realm of the gods in their high "heaven." Endogenously we have a system of checks and balances -- but the Supreme court can be infiltrated with a justice who takes her orders only from the exogenous realm -- legislating from the bench -- as Ruthie Ginsberg just did when she wrote the majority opinion making it legal for financial service providers to knowingly advise against the interests of their clients and not have to answer for it. Or when a President who is made president through exogenous manipulation can write executive orders by direction "from above" even when those orders spell disaster for the people of this country and for billions of people around the world.

The exogenous agents operate outside the control of endogenous variables like profit, the laws, law enforcement, middle class morality systems and public approval. Exogenous variables include weaponized weather modification, earthquake warfare, false-flag terrorism -- where the true effects are known to the exogenous designers with hidden technologies of applied psychology and applied sociology, oil sabotage misrepresented as acts of God, trade agreements, organized crime, sabotaging "social legislation" or of non-existant bogeymen like falsely alleged "Islamic fundamentalist terrorists" or "local extremists" and human error (BP) or, with High and Celente, impersonal market forces with their long-term waves, natural cycles, and other stupid extrapolations -- deceiving those inside the matrix and seeing only the endogenous variables.

My goal and yours I think is to show people the reality of the exogenous control room so that people will wake up and extend the peoples control to the levers that have been exogenous -- so that there will no longer be exogenous and endogenous control -- so that secret power and shadow government will be eliminated -- so no one will have the money and power to set up secret exogenous control rooms ever again.

The fact that organized crime with distinct racial and cultural extreme prejudice have been using their exogenous controls to expropriate, enslave and eliminate the people capable of giving them trouble in the Rothschild solar system. That would be you and me, I hope, and all who today share our goal. We evolve from conspiracy theorists, to conspiracy watchers, to leaders of the breakout of those bound by exclusion from a say in manipulating the exogenous controlling variables. We identify those controls, we show how those controls have been put on destructive settings, and we identify new settings for those variables so they will produce benefit for all instead of gain for the exogenous elite at the expense of the farmed endogenous slave-plantation global economy.

Celente and High defend the lie that the endogenous variables are all that there is and that they are the prophets of that system and that doom is inevitable so you had better not use you money to build up stores of tools and necessities for needed entrepreneurship, but rather, they say, to buy gold or get out of the country. They see a conspiracy and they see endogenous variables in decay -- but they tell you nothing about what outside controlling variables we need to get hold of -- how we need to write new rules for the game when the Rothschilds own Boardwalk and Park Place and all of the properties with hotels, except for Baltic Avenue which we own and have no money to buy even one house. Celente says we are doomed -- he does not tell us how to rewrite the rules that govern outcome -- and how to keep the banker from using the bank as his own money.

Your mission and mine is to show them the hidden levers in Israel/London/ WallStreet/ Bejing/Shanghi, Hong Kong/TelAviv/ Dubai control rooms. We want to wrest control of what directs the outcome of our life efforts, wrest it from the hidden control rooms -- ending elite control of the exogenous variables -- taking over the system that sets up the endogenous system for our oppression and resetting those controls -- with social credit and debt-free money and anti-trust and regulation of foreign trade and the end of credit monopoly and the power to forgive debt etc. But how? It matters how it is done. Somehow all at once and everywhere at once -- to prevent them from crashing everything and destroying everyone rather than face defeat, exposure and loss of wealth and godlike power. That is what I see Salbuchi offering the world. But it still boils down to Hamilton against Jefferson.

So Happy 4th -- with happier ones to come.

All the best, today and always,

Dick Eastman